The Jam: Bit Surrender, or Beat Defender, or whatever

Written by Eric Olsen
Published August 22, 2003

As Dawn mentioned yesterday, we have been having no end of computer and ISP problems between the worms, virus and spybot scans, security patches, and every other manner of heinous horseshit. I had to download an anti-virus program from BitDefender, which is cool and all (that reminds me to run their SobigF removal tool), but the BitDefender logo pops up at seeming random on my screen - "BitDefender to the rescue dum ta dum!!!" - and every time it does so I hear "Beat Surrender" by the Jam playing in my head because, in a cosmic coincidence, we listened to the new Jam collection The Sound of The Jam in the car on our recent vacation. Oh the vagaries of fate!

One of my favorite aspects of the steady flow of reissues and collections on CD - which never seems to end and well it shouldn't as long as I get them for free - is that you get to hear an artist's oeuvre anew, and often long-forgotten or never-heard songs jump out and assert themselves among the obvious "hits." This is not the case with the Jam, I'm sad to say, whom I loved at the time ('77-'82) even seeing the trio (Paul Weller - guitars and vocals, Bruce Foxton - bass and vocals, Rick Buckler - drums) front row at a small club on their first U.S. tour. Only the "hits," the songs I remembered, are really very good, and a band that at the time was considered a rival of the Clash, has been rightly reduced to also-ran status.

Not that they sucked - their best material is as good as most anything from the era - and though they were considered "punk," they were much more an updated '60s "mod" band like the Kinks (made explicit by their cover of "David Watts"), Small Faces, Who, etc., than they were thrashing punkers.

They were most punkish at the beginning (the CD is helpfully arranged chronologically): their first single "In the City" slashes and punches with punk intensity and riffage, "The Modern World" rocks but the tempo and intensity were already mitigating. By "Going Underground" they were true mods with harmonies, call and response vocals, ringing rather than slashing guitar chords, even a modulation! "Start!" incorporated some '60s soul funkiness that would manifest itself in Weller's Style Council post-Jam.

The lovely acoustic guitar stylings of "That's Entertainment" proved Weller an accomplished melodist as well as a keen (if young and naive) social commentator. By the time of their greatest songs, "Town Called Malice" and "Beat Surrender," the Jam was a charging bass-organ-drums soul-pop band - English Motown - not recognizably punk at all.

Hold the spunky Jam well in your memory, but don't confuse them with greatness.

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Jam: Bit Surrender, or Beat Defender, or whatever
Published: August 22, 2003
Type:
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: Alternative Rock
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Music: Alternative Rock
All Music Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 22, 2003 @ 14:31PM — Bill Sherman [URL]

Beg to differ big time. I play and relisten to the first two Jam releases (In The City and This Is The Modern World) regularly - and find 'em both prime collections of Britpop punkery. Weller's understandable desire to expand his range diluted things over time - the later discs sound much spottier to these ears - but I still contend that the band's first two releases are both Just Plain Great.

But, then, I still play the Kinks' first records for plesure, too. . .

#2 — August 22, 2003 @ 15:39PM — Eric Olsen

I guess I see them as a singles band, and those last two were my favorites. I liked a few Style Council songs also, but Weller solo has been icky.

#3 — August 22, 2003 @ 16:30PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

The Jam were essentially a singles band, because in the UK the singles market ruled. Unlike in the US where singles and the charts were corrupt, in the UK, singles were a true market, hence bands responded with singles.

I think The Jam were brilliant, and I still enjoy listening to them (though I can't buy anymore collections, because I've already bought enough). Essentially Universal (who bought Poldor) are flogging their catalogue as hard as they can.

Interesting to note that Pete Weller has become the avatar of what in the UK is known as "dad rock".

#4 — August 24, 2003 @ 19:00PM — michele [URL]

I loved - still love - The Jam. I've been searching out garage sales for an old turntable just so I can listen to Snap! on vinyl once more.

Bruce Foxton had some good solo stuff, but Weller and The Style Council (though they did have a few good songs) left me only aching for more Jam.

#5 — August 24, 2003 @ 20:31PM — Eric Olsen

The point I was trying to make with this was not to put the Jam down - I loved them at the time too - but to say that some music holds up better in the memory than in the ears, and for me this has happened to the Jam.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/7760)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments