<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on RIAA Vows to Sue Only "Substantial" File Sharers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:09:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Michelle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/19/142756.php#comment-15474</link>
<description>However, they still don&#039;t come up with a definition of the word &quot;substantial&quot;. If they assume up to 150 000$ per song, wouldn&#039;t even just one song be substantial?

Anyway, just wanted to share (ha!), that the German industry seems to like the American model and wants to sue P2P users as well.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15474@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2003 17:09:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Craig Lyndall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/19/142756.php#comment-15385</link>
<description>Now if the community could somehow organize and each carry 20-30 different songs then, they could all share in harmony without outing themselves as a &quot;substantial&quot; sharer.  It&#039;s illegal, and I understand the RIAA, but they should spend more time worrying about alternatives to Kazaa that would make people choose against it, rather than trying to stop the free stuff.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15385@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:24:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>