<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Fox News courting humiliation</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 6 May 2004 14:03:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/11/184746.php#comment-62483</link>
<description>I suppose I should block them anyway. More wasted time. :(</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62483@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2004 14:03:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/11/184746.php#comment-62482</link>
<description>See, there&#039;s no googlejuice after you go through the redirect, so these stupid spam comments may not go away right away, but they will eventually.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62482@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2004 14:00:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by nathan</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/11/184746.php#comment-62481</link>
<description>nice site</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">62481@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 May 2004 13:53:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie &quot;Fair and Balanced&quot; Davis</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/11/184746.php#comment-14916</link>
<description>Dim-witted? Apparently so.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14916@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 23:41:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dennis De Porter</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/11/184746.php#comment-14912</link>
<description>Can Fox, Inc. be so dim-witted that they did not foresee the trap into which they fell. Fox gave Franken publicity Framlem would never have purchased. End result: A Best Seller for Franken all thanks to Fox&#039;s lawyers.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14912@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 22:03:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/11/184746.php#comment-14773</link>
<description>dang, i gotta write a book with &quot;we report, you decide&quot; in the title.

i&#039;ll be rich!!!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14773@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:26:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mike</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/11/184746.php#comment-14745</link>
<description>Thanks, Al. That was a very fair and balanced assessment of the situation.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14745@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2003 19:59:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>