<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Starflyer 59 - Old</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2002-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:59:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by thom young on Starflyer 59 - Old</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/11/181747.php#comment-413174</link>
<description>I stumbled upon this review, because I use to write some stuff on buzzgrinder, before I became a famous author on my own right (joke). I think that you need to put on &quot;Gold&quot; and listen numerous times. Old is a great album and your review gave it justice, besides a review is an opinion anyways. I think with repaeted listens of Starflyer, and start with Silver 1994 and work your way to TVVSSV 2005, you&#039;ll see why this band is so good.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F08%2F11%2F181747.php%23comment-413174&amp;itemDate=2006-07-24+00%3A59%3A01&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+thom+young+on+Starflyer+59+-+Old"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F08%2F11%2F181747.php%23comment-413174&amp;itemDate=2006-07-24+00%3A59%3A01&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+thom+young+on+Starflyer+59+-+Old" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">413174@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:59:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mike sanchez on Starflyer 59 - Old</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/11/181747.php#comment-229968</link>
<description>that was THE worst SF59 review i&#039;ve ever read, period.  besides your own personal opinion, the analysis of the music is so inaccurate.  their music is too &quot;thick&quot; and &quot;dense&quot;?? i&#039;m sure that excludes a lot of good music from your taste.  that was an asinine comment, and shows you haven&#039;t listened to much of SF59 as you claim.  ever heard of &quot;Leave Here a Stranger&quot;??  at first impression, a person will notice the minimalist characteristics of the music.  you claim this is SF59&#039;s best album.  you will be very hard-pressed to find someone that will agree with you.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F08%2F11%2F181747.php%23comment-229968&amp;itemDate=2005-09-10+11%3A15%3A23&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+mike+sanchez+on+Starflyer+59+-+Old"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F08%2F11%2F181747.php%23comment-229968&amp;itemDate=2005-09-10+11%3A15%3A23&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+mike+sanchez+on+Starflyer+59+-+Old" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">229968@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 11:15:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>