Reorganizing My Record Collection

Written by Mark Saleski
Published August 11, 2003

Top five reasons to reorganize my albums:

    5. The living room is getting kinda difficult to 'live' in.
    4. I know I've got this cool Phil Alvin/Sun Ra record somewhere...and I'm just dying to hear it.
    3. Haven't had a good snootful of dust in a while.
    2. It's fun to think about all of the music I own that involved no transfer of my money to the RIAA (used records baby!).
    1. Makes me feel superior to the digital-only crowd.

In Nick Hornby's book High Fidelity, the main character talks about how he reorganizes his record collection during moments of personal crisis. That's not why I started this project last night. I did it because my LP's were only partially sorted and my recent acquisitions were getting swallowed up ("...ok, where the heck is that Carla Bley record I just bought?!!").

The first order of business was to cull all of the jazz records. That was pretty easy since they were more or less all in one spot. Alphabetize those puppies and I'm done. They go back into the display crates. The same process was then applied to the folk, country and blues albums. My cd's are organized similarly. Those three genres have enough similarities that mixing them together just makes sense to me. Soundtracks and exotica (Enoch Light, Les Baxter, etc) get the same treatment.

There...the easy part is done. Now on to 'everything else' (rock, pop, reggae, metal...all of it).

First, twenty-six small piles are made to begin the alphabetical fun. Then I divide each crate of records into small-ish piles. Maybe 100 records each. Then each pile is sorted (ascending) 'front-to-back'. After all of that craziness was completed I then had to take each sorted pile and distribute the contents to the appropriate 'master' alphabetical pile.

Now, when I started this project (around 7 pm) I figured this would take me, at most, about three hours. Right. I got to the stage of having the twenty six 'master' piles at around 11pm. Yikes.

For the last bit of fun I had to sort each pile before placing the records in their display crate (I use these wooden storage crates turned on their side...so that the records can be viewed, left-to-right, by the spine). The bad thing is that I'm only able to sort stuff alphabetically in ascending order (I can do it descending but it take forever!). That means that I have to reverse everything as they go into the crate. Ugh. No big deal for letters like 'F'. A huge deal for the letter 'S'. Gees, there musta been at least 250 of those suckers!

I was done a little after one in the morning.

Boy are my arms (and fingers) tired! It was worth it though. Now I can actually find what I'm looking for without wasting twenty minutes, all the while swearing about my laziness and lack of organization. My collection is pretty small though (around 1500). I don't know what I'd do if it was in the 5-digit range. Maybe rent a Bobcat or something.

Go ahead, ask me where that Elvis Costello record is. I can find it now!

(First posted on Mark Is Cranky)

Mark Saleski is a writer and music obsessive based out of the Monadnock region of New Hampshire. On his best day, he hopes to channel the ghosts of Lester Bangs and Jack Kerouac. He spends the hours of 9:32PM to 1:37AM carving out music reviews and essays for Jazz.com, Blogcritics.org and other publications.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Reorganizing My Record Collection
Published: August 11, 2003
Type:
Section: Music
Writer: Mark Saleski
Mark Saleski's BC Writer page
Mark Saleski's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mark Saleski
All Music Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 11, 2003 @ 15:06PM — The Theory

damn, i've got about 400-500 cds and it takes me about an hour to two hours to organize them...

peace.

#2 — August 11, 2003 @ 15:09PM — Craig Lyndall [URL]

I am up over 700 CD's now and it takes me a very long time. Plus with CD's I have 10 in the car, 7 in my bag for work, 3 that weren't unpacked from the trip, 2 case logic type binders and jewel cases for all in different locations. I clear off my coffee table and pile it all up for the matching process. Then and ONLY then can I put them back in their alphabetized slot on my shelves.

#3 — August 11, 2003 @ 16:41PM — Eric Olsen

Ugh, don't even want to think about it, although I enjoyed reading Mark's very logical and satisfying reorg. There are many questions to be answered, as in do you break it up stylistically or go straight alphabetical? I have ended up with everything lumped together alphabeticaly, other than reggae/Caribbean, blues, and Christmas have their own sections. I also separate out collections, but when you're filing collections do you go strictly by the title, or differentiate stylistically? I have ended up with an unsatisfying hybrid to my collections/soundtracks/multiple artist sets.

So all of that is in pretty good order, but then we get to everything that has come out in the last year-and-a-half: I have 2002 in a separate case (about 1500 CDs) and in no particular order at all, and 2003 is sitting in various piles surrounding me as I write (at least 1000).

This doesn't take into account my traveling DJ collection, which I keep ready to go for when I DJ live (5-10 times a year) or a vast number of 12" singles I picked up about a year ago (maybe 2000 of them) that I have barely gone through let alone begun to organize.

Forgetting the 12" (I have another few thousand filed appropriately), I am guessing it will take me about a week to file 2002-03 and I don't know when the hell that's going to happen. I need an intern.

A final note - I don't actually count what I own, but periodically I do estimate by measuring the space it takes up and we are definitely over 20,000 combined vinyl albums, singles, and 12" singles, and CD albums and singles. Yeay me, but here is some perspective: I have one friend who has 400,000 vinyl records alone, and another with over 100,000 - it's all relative.

#4 — August 11, 2003 @ 16:47PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

...so i take it when you guys have to move all of your friend are mysteriously on vacation? ;-)

#5 — August 11, 2003 @ 17:03PM — Eric Olsen

Right now all but a couple hundred CDs are at my office, didn't even bother to try to move the big collection to the new house.

#6 — August 13, 2003 @ 18:48PM — Michael [URL]

I can't believe that some of you are still keeping your CDs in jewel boxes. I've been using binders for over 10 years b/c they provide much greater portability and organization. I recently added one of these Odyssey cases, which I use to hold CDs in those little individual plastic sleeves.

#7 — August 13, 2003 @ 18:59PM — The Theory

That would annoy the bejezus outta me

#8 — August 13, 2003 @ 22:53PM — Frost [URL]

Michael: yeah I used to use binders.... until $3,500 worth of CD's magically disappeared late one night. I was left with a few hundered empty cases and a shattered passenger window.

I used to organize my CD collection, but I have somewhat given up on it. Now it's in 3 piles
1.) All time favorite albums (maybe 150 CD's)
2.) Keepers (maybe 1000 or so)
3.) Crap to sell on ebay (well... in my room there's about 400-500, but in the garage there's almost 10,000. no joke... it's a long story)

All my vinyl is just stashed away in a corner.

#9 — August 14, 2003 @ 08:10AM — Dew

Again my focus is off point: I used to think I was doing good with my (what I realize is now miniscule) collection of 800, plus the graces of hundreds of singles I dont count as being part of my collection. I have some major catching up to do...

Back on Point: All my cds are choronological in the order that I purchased them, seems to work best for me because I can remember where and why I bought it. I use Case Logic only and store the cases on Bookshelves (which is another collection in its self, not to mention the actual books and apartments are not bookcase friendly) And also there is software out there as well. For instance I am quite fond of Collectorz.com, for pack rats like myself this software helps organize the tracks, purchase price, list price, location, basically anything you want to remember or file is at the touch of a button. You can just put the cd in your comp and it will search the internet for info, the only thing you have to fill in is whatever you want to track, for example: location.

But if your collection is knocking pass the thousands I'm guessing thats more than you want to load.

And yes Eric you do need an intern :-)

#10 — August 14, 2003 @ 11:25AM — Eric Olsen

Wow Dew, I admire your level of organization, and you answered the question about packaging that always bugs me about folders. I still want the liner notes, track info and all of that together with the actual CD.

I think chronological by purchase is a great way to organize if the collection is of manageable size, and only one person has to be able to find anything. I actually have my 2002 shelves in roughly the order I received them.

Organization is actually a huge topic that relates directly to file sharing, digital music in general, and even the way people think. I'd like to see a post on that.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/7509)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments