Freedom of conscience 101

Written by Al Barger
Published August 10, 2003
page 1 | 2

But see, there I go already- eagerly justifying why it's ok to like DAC.

I also love Elvis gospel, even though I don't really believe in Jebus. Still, there is a sense of peace and fulfillment that comes out of some of these records that he never touched in his secular work. It's a spiritual thing.

But music sometimes moves me by reflecting light into the darker crevices of the soul. David Allen Coe made some highly humorous and catchy explorations of the racial insecurities of white guys- not reflecting us back in the best light.

In short, enjoying the Rolling Stones "Stupid Girl" does not mean that I hate women, nor does an interest in DAC mean that I have issues with black folk.

More troubling to me personally, I have a fairly intense devotion to the 12 minute album version of James Brown's "Papa Don't Take No Mess." I'm all down with James in his pride, but this makes me significantly uncomfortable. The song, after all, can easily enough be seen as a celebration of child abuse.

This is the opposite sentiment from the properly set sensitivities of Suzanne Vega's "Luka." James is praising, celebrating the memory of his father's harsh discipline. "But when we did wrong, Papa beat the HELL out of us. HIT ME!" I'm well aware of how easily proper discipline can cross over into just plain nasty child abuse. Still, there's something in the unique emotional expression of this recording that I can't stay away from. Lots of things. This is a key recording in the whole James Brown cannon. It continues to fascinate me.

Indeed, if I find my own interest in a piece of art troubling, then I take it as a sign that it's something I definitely need to hear and think about. Don't worry though, 100 viewings of Night of the Hunter doesn't mean I'm going on a killing spree. I'm not planning on one right away, anyhow.

In short, art in different forms presents useful reflections and refractions of the human experience from all corners and perspectives, even- nay, especially- when it's showing things that are wicked or dysfunctional.

The King James Bible is another work of art that I put pretty much stock in. I take it with a shaker of salt, however- particularly the book of Joshua, and the stuff about people coming back from the dead. Here's one part, though, that I think particularly wise:

Titus 1:15 - Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.

page 1 | 2
Unreformed hawkish Hoosier hillbilly and sometimes candidate Al Barger runs the still squeezin' down the psychodelic Kentucky moonshine at MoreThings.com, what with the paranoid religious visions and the Pentacostal music and visions of God and anarchy running amok and such. Somebody oughta call the cops to report his out of control freedom of conscience. Till they come to take him away somewhere where he can't hurt anyone else, you can check out his weekly column of NEW ALBUM RELEASES.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Freedom of conscience 101
Published: August 10, 2003
Type:
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: Rap, Music: Pop, Music: Country and Americana, Music: Alternative Rock
Writer: Al Barger
Al Barger's BC Writer page
Al Barger's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Al Barger
Music: Rap
Music: Pop
Music: Country and Americana
Music: Alternative Rock
All Music Articles
Al Barger's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 10, 2003 @ 22:15PM — Tom Johnson [URL]

Really nice work, Al. A perfect antidote to the Billie Holiday-inspired apathy . . . This is the kind of stuff that makes me proud to be a part of Blogcritics.

#2 — August 10, 2003 @ 22:58PM — Eric Olsen

Very real and very personal Al, one of your best. BTW, I think the JB song, which I heard on the RADIO (NPR, blues show) the other night is about drawing the line RIGHT HERE, which has the appeal of concrete finality in a very gray world, which coincidentally may be behind MD's (don't want to speak for her) original post.

#3 — August 10, 2003 @ 23:42PM — Natalie Davis [URL]

Al, your fine posting here brings Eminem to mind. I won't buy his stuff because I do not want to put money into his pocket. But I absolutely listened to his music before judging it. I believe him to be a talented artist, whatever his beliefs, whatever his politics. I don't agree with his professed anti-woman and anti-gay views, naturally, but it would be dishonest for me not to say, for example, that his "Lose Yourself" leaves me breathless each time I hear it. Credit should go where it is due.

#4 — August 10, 2003 @ 23:58PM — Al Barger [URL]

Thank you Eric and Tom for your kind words.

Thank you as well, Natalie. I particularly like it when I'm able to please you.

"Kill You" probably rates as my top Eminem pick. I certainly don't literally endorse the behaviors being fantasized. Then again, neither does Eminem.

I do, however, perfectly well identify with those feelings of frustration and rage which he articulates there so well.

I find that if I've been listening to Eminem much, it's a good sign that I probably need to go find some children to play with. An hour or two of active playtime will usually counteract a lot of negative emotional buildup.

#5 — August 11, 2003 @ 00:02AM — Frost [URL]

I agree Al, very nice article. I think where people might get tangled up is that our culture is (for the most part) so literal and concerte. There seems to be little to no room in it for artistic license.

Prodigy does a song called "Smack My Bitch Up". Of course people were instantly up in arms about it defaming women, while if you see the video it's true meaning of a self-abusing drug addict (woman) who is slowly killing herself.

People need to take it easy and realize that sometimes true artists say things that they would never do either for shock value or just to get a point across.

If gangsta rappers actually killed as many people as they sing about then there would be no southern california left.

#6 — August 11, 2003 @ 00:10AM — Natalie Davis [URL]

Or for humor's sake. Take the Dixie Chicks' "Goodbye Earl"? I'm a pacifist and Gandhian -- and that song is a riot! No one believes any of the Chicks would actually perpetrate violence on anyone else. Wow, I would be ashamed of Natalie Maines if she pulled something like that.

Ooh, another one (the name of the '80s band that performed this sadly escapes me at present; it's been a rough day): "I'm Glad that Elvis Is Dead." No decent person is glad that Presley is dead (and I think I saw him at the Fresh Fields in the organic peanut butter section last week, anyway), but man, is that song a howl.

#7 — August 11, 2003 @ 00:24AM — Al Barger [URL]

I'll accept "Goodbye Earl" if you absolve me of guilt for listening to Guns N Roses "I Used to Love Her But I Had to Kill Her."

While we're at it, can I get absolution for liking "One in a Million"?

#8 — August 11, 2003 @ 00:38AM — Natalie Davis [URL]

Oh, Al, I am a huge fan of Guns 'N Roses. Can't stand "One in a Million," personally, but I make no judgment against anyone who does.

#9 — August 11, 2003 @ 01:03AM — Mac Diva [URL]

Al, you obviously overlooked much of what I said in "Loving the artist, hating the song," in order to pen this tirade. I definitely made it clear that I was interested in how we make decisions about what to keep and what to reject when it comes to music, not a bonfire of the CDs.

Part of the reason I will reject "Ain't Nobody's Business" is that Holiday's life and music often intersected. I am not at all sure she didn't support the sentiments being expressed in the song. On the other hand, I doubt Ry Cooder is an advocate of misogyny, so I won't delete "The Very Thing That Make's You Poor."

As a writer, I am more than a little in touch with the practice of speaking in character, so, as I said in my essay, I take that into account when listening to music. For example, Randy Newman does in character lyrics that are like short stories written in the first-person.

Nor am I a stranger to blue humor as you seem to believe. I've heard everything from Richard Pryor at his lowest down, to Moms Mabley and LaWanda Paige when she wasn't being Aunt Esther.

You underestimate the Diva.

#10 — August 11, 2003 @ 01:14AM — Natalie Davis [URL]

I have no doubt of the Diva's intelligence or good intentions. :)

MD, you are on-target about the intersection between Billie Holiday's life and her art. (I live in Baltimore, a big Billie Holiday town; Lady Day is revered here.) Personally, I find it valuable to hear what, for example, the victims of abuse have to say. And one who was an artist of her caliber? Listening to "Ain't Nobody's Business" helps me know a little bit more of her life, her attitude, her strengths and weaknesses, which helps me understand and appreciate her artistry more.

Please don't take my comments as criticism; I just believe I do myself a disservice when I close my mind to anything. YMMV.

#11 — August 11, 2003 @ 01:18AM — Al Barger [URL]

No, I think I understood the Diva perfectly- though the whole post wasn't specifically a response to you. You were kind of a taking off point.

Here's the difference: You won't listen to this recording of Ms Holiday because I am not at all sure she didn't support the sentiments being expressed in the song. Whereas, that wouldn't even cause me hesitation. Indeed, if I thought that this absolutely represented her personal beliefs, that would only re-inforce my interest in hearing it. Indeed, you've got me curious enough now that I'm absolutely going to have to go look it up.

Even if you decide that the narrator of the song and even the singer are dysfunctional, does that make their statement worthless? I think not. Those emotions of shame and defiance and whatever else might be going on there are a substantial part of the human condition, even above and beyond obvious immediate issues of wife beating.

#12 — August 11, 2003 @ 02:48AM — excitableboy

No, Al, it was the Contras who were murdering Communists.

#13 — August 11, 2003 @ 05:29AM — Al Barger [URL]

Good. Communists need murdered. Rats must be exterminated.

#14 — August 11, 2003 @ 23:49PM — Mac Diva [URL]

Jeez! Al! Al! Al!

#15 — August 12, 2003 @ 00:26AM — Natalie Davis [URL]

Don't mind Al; he's just being purposely provocative.

#16 — August 12, 2003 @ 00:30AM — Al Barger [URL]

Natalie is correct. I AM being purposely provocative. It is also correct that rats need to be exterminated. Also, any crimes committed by the Contras do NOT excuse the Clash for enthusiastically supporting a murderous communist dictatorship.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/7493)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments