<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Arnold's problem</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:17:26 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/10/172156.php#comment-14635</link>
<description>Al Qaeda et al are idiots.  They&#039;re largely just randomly blowing people up.  That&#039;s no good.  It makes a difference what or who exactly you are blowing up.

And oh yes, a sufficient dose of explosives can solve a lot of problems, regardless of candy-ass &quot;liberal&quot; philosophy.  The most blunt example, Japan.  Two bombs put an end to WWII.  

Now you might want to argue that this was very harsh, or unnecessary.  I don&#039;t entirely know what to think on that myself.  

However, you can&#039;t very well argue that it didn&#039;t work.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14635@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:17:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Steve Rhodes</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/08/10/172156.php#comment-14633</link>
<description>
 Gosh, I thought that was the philosophy of Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups.  And while it is good at killing people, it doesn&#039;t solve problems.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14633@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:03:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>