Nick Cave - No More Shall We Part

Written by Tom Johnson
Published August 03, 2003

First impressions . . . you know what they say about that. They're always right. Unless they're not. In the case of Nick Cave And The Bad Seeds' No More Shall We Part, they were decidedly wrong.

The first time I heard this album, it was shortly after discovering Cave via his latest album, Nocturama. Aside from and excruciatingly repetitive closing track ("Baby I'm On Fire" - fifteen minutes; seriously, read these lyrics - the whole thing consists of "the ______ says it/baby I'm on fire" with no extended instrumental break), his latest album is solid and enjoyable, and the haunting melancholy he's known for goes full circle and just becomes beautiful instead of depressing. Now, after I'd heard this album a few times and thoroughly decided I really liked it, I found a number of Cave-fan reviews disparaging my new-found joy. Apparently it's a bit of a departure for the group, and, as such, is a letdown compared to his previous releases. I could understand some of the points these fans made in their reviews - some of the songs try a bit to hard to "rock" when being creepy and dark is really what works best for Nick Cave. Overall, however, the album still managed to please even picky me - that has to say something.

I vowed to pick up any of Cave's more recent albums (No More Shall We Part, The Boatman's Call, etc.) when I saw them used, as these were the ones garnering rave reviews on All Music Guide. AMG gave Nocturama 2.5 stars - a pretty bad rating. As they say, "Everything is predictable and sounds like something Cave has done before." Maybe so - but it was new to me. Somehow, contradictory to how I feel about it, "Baby I'm On Fire" is getting the most attention, being held up as "intense" instead of how I saw it - boring. I feared that what Cave fans saw in Nick Cave that they enjoyed would be the very things I couldn't stand based on these observations.

Finally a used copy of No More Shall We Part came along and I grabbed it. I immediately gave it a spin and found that I really . . . didn't . . . like it. At all. Everything about it was too morose, too down. It was everything that I'd liked about Nocturama but overdone by a factor of 10. I could have probably felt average about the album, but the thing that really went too far was the excessive use of female vocals where they simply do not belong. It was during the last couple of minutes of "Hallelujah" (not the wonderful Leonard Cohen song everyone covers) when Kate & Anna McGarrigle begin their contribution to the album - two minutes of their soft, church-singing (read: not gospel) style repeating "hallelujah" and some lyrics. It was too much, too much. When I say "female voices where they do not belong" I mean - they don't belong on this album, at all, anywhere. This is one of those touches that has to be done deftly, and it just wasn't done so on this album. It's heavyhanded, trying to push the point that Cave's "got religion" a bit too far.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
No More Shall We Part No More Shall We Part
Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds
Music,
Nocturama Nocturama
Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds
Music,

Nick Cave - No More Shall We Part
Published: August 03, 2003
Type:
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: Rock
Writer: Tom Johnson
Tom Johnson's BC Writer page
Tom Johnson's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Tom Johnson
Music: Rock
All Music Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 3, 2003 @ 23:15PM — James Russell [URL]

There were only a very few points on Nocturama where the band could be accused of rocking out, those being "Babe I'm On Fire", "Dead Man In My Bed" and "Bring It On". (Can't remember how rocking the other tracks were, but I don't recall any of them being as uptempo as those.) Indeed, Nocturama disappointed me greatly because I'd been led to expect the band had rocked things up a bit, and, well, they hadn't. As for "Babe I'm On Fire", I don't get into it for the "intensity", I get into it because I think it's hilarious. The sheer riotous excess of the whole thing is staggering, and I love it for that.

Have you heard The Boatman's Call? What did you make of that?

#2 — August 4, 2003 @ 01:27AM — Tom Johnson [URL]

These are the only two I've heard so far, James. I'm on the prowl for more, but don't want to jump in too deep too quickly. I'm sure I'll get around to hearing everything at some point . . . I'm always up for hearing more good music.

#3 — August 4, 2003 @ 16:24PM — Sam Gaines

Tom,
I'm an old Cave fan, going back to the Birthday Party days. Just to get an idea of the extent of his music as a "solo" artist (in quotes b/c the Bad Seeds are an important part of his sound--no mere backing band), I might gently suggest picking up Let Love In, The Firstborn Is Dead, and the album that opens up with The Mercy Seat (can't recall the name right now). Murder Ballads takes the moroseness to a difficult depth, too, if you're so inclined. I'm not. Anymore, anyway.
Of course, every other Cave fan would choose something different and call me an idiot, so please ignore me.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/7385)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments