Deregulated media: Coming to a city near you.

Written by Rebecca S
Published August 01, 2003

Michael Powell, Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, America's chief media regulator and coincidental son of Colin Powell, has made no secret of his plans to deregulate the media industry. June 2, 2003 saw a controversial and astonishing measure: the FCC expanded the cap on media ownership from 35% of a single market to 45%. Largely promoted by media conglomerates, the move evoked a startling response in America's public.

Legislators found their email accounts, mailboxes and telephones flooded by outraged citizens. Critics charged Powell, 'How can a non-elected, appointed official have this power?' Millions of concerned voices spoke out with complaints. What the FCC once thought was laid to rest would appear to be barely dormant.

Representatives were driven to bring the initiative to the House, which overwhelmingly supported its undoing. In a 400-21 vote, the move will see itself in Senate.

Should the measure pass in the Senate, however, President Bush has threatened a veto. As the veto may be overridden with a 2/3 vote, Bush has also been assembling his deregulatory supporters in Congress to ensure that the override veto will not occur.

Included in groups opposed to the measure are the National Organization for Women and the National Rifle Association. These strange bedfellows are usually unfathomable yet the atrocity of the measure makes it plausible. In spite of the outcry, however, the threat of Bush's veto looms.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Deregulated media: Coming to a city near you.
Published: August 01, 2003
Type:
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Media
Writer: Rebecca S
Rebecca S's BC Writer page
Rebecca S's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Rebecca S
Culture: Media
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 1, 2003 @ 15:14PM — Al Barger [URL]

"Atrocity"?

#2 — August 1, 2003 @ 15:43PM — rebecca [URL]

atrocity-the quality or state of being atrocious.

atrocious-appalling, horrifying.

#3 — August 1, 2003 @ 17:29PM — Steve Rhodes [URL]


It will be interesting to see if Bush would make this his very first veto.

If he gets enough mail and phone calls from people saying they'll veto his second term, he may back off.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/7366)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments