<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on "Ventilator Blues" by the Rolling Stones</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:44:07 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Rodney Welch</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/07/27/031308.php#comment-13918</link>
<description>Some records are more Jagger (high production values) and some are more Richards (sloppy, funky), and &lt;i&gt;Exile&lt;/i&gt; is definitely the latter. Jagger himself said in an interview he never understood why people like it. It&#039;s not the very best Stones disc (that would be &lt;i&gt;Beggar&#039;s Banquet&lt;/i&gt;) but it&#039;s among the best -- a kind of raw, drunken, excessive masterpiece, and it surely has one of the most perfect titles of any rock album in history, and one that suited the band perfectly.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13918@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:44:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ed Driscoll</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/07/27/031308.php#comment-13897</link>
<description>Al,

No question &lt;i&gt;Exile&lt;/i&gt; just exudes atmosphere. As I recall (second hand--I was about seven when the album was first released!) people just didn&#039;t know what to make of it--it was so dark, dank and murky sounding, especially compared to the slicker and more accessible Stones albums that bookended it, that it took a while for it to coalesce in its listeners&#039; brains. There were reviews at that the time that hated it, but I remember a late-1980s &quot;Rolling Stone&quot; issue that rated it the number one or two most influential record of the 1970s. 

Ed</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13897@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:26:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/07/27/031308.php#comment-13892</link>
<description>Oh, yeah.  It&#039;s all good.  &quot;I don&#039;t want to walk and talk about Jesus, I just want to see his fa-aace&quot;

As to releasing such a track today, they should come up with a song as good as either of these.

The production sound of &lt;i&gt;Exile on Main Street&lt;/i&gt; is a little murky or rough, recorded in exile in a damp, musty basement, or so it sounds.  However, it has an immediacy and a life of its own.  I don&#039;t know if their basement was literally damp and musty, but the record sure feels like it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13892@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:53:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ed Driscoll</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/07/27/031308.php#comment-13888</link>
<description>Al,

Wow, you really know your obscure Stones tunes! Ironically enough, it flows into an equally obscure song that I&#039;ve always liked a lot, &quot;Just Want To See His Face&quot;. It has an incredible groove from the Fender Rhodes and upright bass. It&#039;s hard to see the Stones releasing either of those tracks today, which were both probably 4:00-in-the-morning jams recorded in Keith Richards&#039; French villa during the &quot;Exile&quot; sessions. 

Ed</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13888@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2003 21:21:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>