OPINION

Matt Millen

Written by RJ Elliott
Published July 26, 2003

The Detroit Lions president has been fined 200,000 dollars for not interviewing a black guy, even though the best candidate for the job was clearly a white guy.

Does this strike anyone else as unjust? If I'm the president of a hockey club, should I be required to interview numerous black and hispanic candidates before (no surprise) hiring a Canadian white dude?

Should the Lakers have interviewed a half-dozen white and Asian forwards before signing Karl Malone?

This is just silly, folks.

RJ Elliott is a graduate student at the University Of Central Florida. His passions in life are sports, politics, nature, and women who have piercings they never told their daddy about. He dislikes daytime television, left-wing dictators, and people who talk like Garrison Keillor. He is ambivalent about the names "Trig" and "Piper."
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Matt Millen
Published: July 26, 2003
Type: Opinion
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Video: News, Culture: Media, Books: Sports, Books: Politics and Affairs
Writer: RJ Elliott
RJ Elliott's BC Writer page
RJ Elliott's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by RJ Elliott
Video: News
Culture: Media
Books: Sports
Books: Politics and Affairs
All Sports Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 26, 2003 @ 11:20AM — visualsimplicity [URL]

It does sound a little silly, but the NFL teams just a couple of months prior to the hiring agreed to interview at least 1 minority candidate (unless they were promoting a person from within the organization). The Detroit Lions had agreed to this, but failed to honor it (and as stated, didn't try really hard to).

#2 — December 18, 2003 @ 23:23PM — myron

Response to R.J. Elliot concerning the Matt Millen situation. The best guy for the job was not a white guy or a black guy. The white guy is who Millen wanted to hire. Millen could have followed the rule and interviewed "minority candidates" without hiring them and still have been well within the limits of honesty and fairness. The process is supposed to expose "minorities" to coaching opportunities which may or may not include actually being hired. Change your pamper and quit crying. Get over it already.

#3 — December 19, 2003 @ 00:48AM — bhw [URL]

I basically agree with the first two commenters on the intent of the NFL interview rule. The problem in this case, though, was the media had already reported that Millen was interested in Mariucci [sp?]. He was the coach Millen wanted. So which minority coaching candidates would have bothered with an interview, knowing that Millen had already made up his mind?

Now the real question is: why did Millen already know which coach he wanted, without having interviewed anyone?

#4 — December 19, 2003 @ 12:22PM — Simm

no other corporation could get away with mandating this. its affirmitive action in a sense and wrong. affirmitive action was great at one time, but when there is an industry which is mostly "minority" why should that rule be in place. In that case, maybe there should be a particular ratio in favor of white people to get them invited to training camp. I'm not serious, it just seems that if you reverse the situation, it seems ridiculous.

#5 — December 19, 2003 @ 12:39PM — bhw [URL]

The NFL is trying to answer the question of why there are so many stellar black players and yet so few black coaches in its ranks. They may or may not be going about it the right way, but that's what they're trying to fix. I think the Matt Millen situation shows that their solution is at least flawed.

As for the players, I think the best players typically make the team and take the field, regardless of race. If you're suggesting that white players are being shut out of opportunities to play because they're white, I think you're off the mark. Just my opinion.

#6 — December 19, 2003 @ 12:47PM — simm

i don't believe that and i'm not suggesting it either. those comments were in jest. i see the problem, but if i were the coach, i would be offended by the fact that the only reason i got an interview is because i was black. especially if i knew i wasn't going to get the job anyway, not because of my color, but because they already had someone in mind. millen should have followed policy, nothing excuses that. but i personally don't believe the policy is correct. nothing racial, it just doesn't seem to exist in other aspects of business, and thats exactly what the nfl is.

#7 — December 19, 2003 @ 17:51PM — Mac Diva [URL]

Are you sure you aren't Robbie Port using another screen name, RJ? You sound just like him, including his obsession with slamming Afrian-Americans. Every post I've read by you so far is a sneer at black people. Just a coincidence, I suppose.

#8 — December 19, 2003 @ 17:53PM — Mac Diva [URL]

Correction: African-Americans.

#9 — December 20, 2003 @ 17:52PM — Dan

bhw, You said " I think the best players typically make the team and take the field, regardless of race". I would agree, and add, that the white quarterbacks in the NFL also are among the best at their position. I guess the question to those who agree with the NFL's interview policy is: Why would the quest for colorblind excellence be discarded at the Head Coaching position?

Response to myron: Matt Millen made several attempts to interview minority candidates, none wanted to go along with the farce. I guess the next step would be to pay minorities to engage in the charade. Maybe $50,000 to save $150,000 would be a smart business decision. Putting some unearned cash into the hands of minority coaching candidates would probably please some fascist diversity worshipers, but ultimately it's sad. If owners really did put racist hiring decisions in front of excellence (and profits) then their punishment would ultimately be realized.

Note that I am very pleased with the work of Marvin Lewis at the helm of my beleagured Bengals. I intend to resume my season ticket package for next season.

#10 — December 21, 2003 @ 16:54PM — Chris Arabia's Less Annoying Alter Ego [URL]

Namath's drunken buffoonery! Joe Namath drunk on network TV last night. Slightly off topic but hilarious Follow the link and click where it says click here:

Namath drunk.

As for the topic, the best way to address this problem is on the field, which is where guys like Lewis, Edwards, and Dungy are doing it, and Crennel and Green might be newly doing it next year.

#11 — April 26, 2004 @ 08:38AM — Brian

come on guys, dennis green and steve mariucci, which would you pick? and by the way Detroit was going to interview Green but once he found out Mariucci was in the mix he backed out! So you see even Green knew he wasn't the best candidate and just made it hard on the Lions organization by not interviewing. what is Detroit supposed to do find some black highschool coach just to say they interviewed some minority?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/7220)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments