<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Roseanne's <i>Adaptation</i></title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:39:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Chris</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/07/16/042341.php#comment-13113</link>
<description>Dang it, you beat me to posting this story, but here is what I would have said about it:

I don&#039;t whether to kick this over to David Foster Wallace for analysis 

OR 

figure out which level of Hell this show came from and what do I need to do to avoid ending up there. 

Hmmm . . . which one of the Deadly Sins would be punished by having to watch a show with Roseanne . . . 

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13113@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 14:39:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dean</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/07/16/042341.php#comment-13100</link>
<description>Who produces these shows?  Who decides, nope Roseanne your 15 minutes is not up?  Yes, Roseanne your ex-husband is more popular than you right now, so go out out there and knock &#039;em dead.  Maybe they should invite her on the &quot;Best Damn Sports Show&quot; and cook up something there?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13100@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:57:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>