<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on T3: ARNOLD'S BACK</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2003 06:55:31 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by visualsimplicity</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/07/02/003429.php#comment-12541</link>
<description>Hah, wow I never thought about the contradictory messages about fate till I read what you wrote. Nice. Definitely there. Sarah Conner&#039;s tomb was engraved with something like &quot;Fate is what we make it&quot; all the while she prepared her grave for Judgment Day. Lovely. But I enjoyed the film nevertheless. It was a good sequel if you ignore the loopholes of time travel (but don&#039;t all time travel movies have loopholes?--including T2).</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12541@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Jul 2003 06:55:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>