<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Mel's Movie gets Focus on Family Thumbs up</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2002-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:31:20 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by _lk%3E0 on Mel&#039;s Movie gets Focus on Family Thumbs up</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/30/101432.php#comment-37111</link>
<description>[d9boL5fR_24i rT0w\`hMoiRk] O8w0l6 aShMvLOz;?r_ nq\^e 5VwEv4Aw H_XlLugiJguZ^Y Rja4MLNSrKhnP jGHOo9kjpZ9\Td Tcm: W;cNWQBwP1D Q8rBsgl2IFfZI B&lt;JzLq 4EbVX vZsd01[BtH3 aJbAdrSpBSB9^GO mwuiVnR o3iiKme2&lt;M pEgfXx oE5;725pYsH hKmV `Ajl_3btkMQ1 8q`&gt;1h6 izvnhGaD3FU 8:rj3c=UdX^Z&gt;l v2bYlbT`OkF o]&gt;cfIZULCcr AUWOG8KIkt:SMjr 6[2dje 8EuUX]MUn 1B?:^XvWcNuSE8 q:Capcj:]E ?b&lt;3Z&gt;FjHtHC 0bKTwS3n^ USzE]\Z lBQom_; x4tAUtspNpI dwh&gt;PgT3I H;Ej 7O;c ?]^dWWZu sK6p9EEq H?laK7PK&gt;oVrA ToP1KzvhsFnh 82EqKUb1p 
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-37111&amp;itemDate=2004-01-17+21%3A31%3A20&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+_lk%253E0+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-37111&amp;itemDate=2004-01-17+21%3A31%3A20&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+_lk%253E0+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37111@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:31:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Laurent Écrivain on Mel&#039;s Movie gets Focus on Family Thumbs up</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/30/101432.php#comment-14302</link>
<description>While I personally think that Gibson is a good actor and I respect his belifes, after hearing now that he is a devout fundamentalist with a rather archaic pre-reform version of Catholicism and, if what they say is true, having outspoken opinions that are more than politically incorrect about women and gays and his film being approved by James Dobson of Focus on the Family, I question if I really like him anymore. 

Normally I lose respect for actors who become &quot;born again&quot;, especially when their once decent acting work now moves towards an evangelistic agenda.  Remember Kirk Cameron?  Once a fun actor to watch, now his last films are about the bloody Rapture called Left Behind.

Sure, sure, you can say that it&#039;s better than him turning into a broke, drug addicted hasbeen, but now he&#039;s an evangelical hasbeen.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-14302&amp;itemDate=2003-08-05+09%3A34%3A40&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Laurent+%C9crivain+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-14302&amp;itemDate=2003-08-05+09%3A34%3A40&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Laurent+%C9crivain+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">14302@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:34:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger on Mel&#039;s Movie gets Focus on Family Thumbs up</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/30/101432.php#comment-12123</link>
<description>Gibson&#039;s passion and obvious burning conviction promise a real, serious artistic statement, not some mish-mash focus-grouped crowd pleaser. 

I&#039;ve never managed to sit through even one of the &lt;i&gt;Lethal Weapons&lt;/i&gt; films, but I&#039;ll be highly interested to see what he&#039;s come up with. 
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-12123&amp;itemDate=2003-07-01+02%3A02%3A22&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Al+Barger+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-12123&amp;itemDate=2003-07-01+02%3A02%3A22&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Al+Barger+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12123@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Jul 2003 02:02:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by James Russell on Mel&#039;s Movie gets Focus on Family Thumbs up</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/30/101432.php#comment-12111</link>
<description>Contrary to rumour, the film apparently will be released with subtitles. Here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.churchofthemasses.blogspot.com/2003_06_22_churchofthemasses_archive.html#105664179273691486&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; from a blogger claiming to have watched a rough cut of the film.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-12111&amp;itemDate=2003-06-30+22%3A15%3A43&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+James+Russell+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-12111&amp;itemDate=2003-06-30+22%3A15%3A43&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+James+Russell+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12111@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:15:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie on Mel&#039;s Movie gets Focus on Family Thumbs up</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/30/101432.php#comment-12059</link>
<description>Why is it a dern shame if, by chance,  is the truth? I&#039;ve believed that about Mel Gibson was a fundielike Catholic fanatic for a very long time, and he and I come from the very same heartbreaking religious tradition. (While he was making movies, babies, and anti-GLBT comments, I was teaching religious education and fighting the &#039;phobes in the Archdiocese of Baltimore.) Save for using the F-word while &quot;acting,&quot; the enemy to Zero Population Growth walks and quacks like a fundie... 

I am not inclined to see his film, which is a shame, because if almost anyone else were at the helm, I would. But I am NOT a Gibson fan. My antipathy for him keeps me away from the movie theater if one of his flicks is the featured attraction. (If a Gibson preview is shown, I leave the theater and return when it&#039;s over. I just can&#039;t stand Mel Gibson; I don&#039;t care if he&#039;s Australian and handsome. I am not parting with my 10-spot if any portion of it goes to him. Better to go see Hugh Jackman in &lt;I&gt;X2: X-Men United&lt;/I&gt; again.) Number two, if Focus likes the movie, you know it has to suck royally, at least for my people. (YMMV.) In fairness, however, people should not criticize the film unless and until they see it.

BUT... I like the idea of the film being in Aramaic. Maybe the fundies will follow Dr. Dobson&#039;s advice and flock to see it -- and maybe they will finally learn that their scriptural interpretation is marred by mistranslations, as many respected theologians report.
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-12059&amp;itemDate=2003-06-30+11%3A55%3A24&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Natalie+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-12059&amp;itemDate=2003-06-30+11%3A55%3A24&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Natalie+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12059@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:55:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Rodney Welch on Mel&#039;s Movie gets Focus on Family Thumbs up</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/30/101432.php#comment-12058</link>
<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/content/news_syndication/article_2003_06_30_gibson.shtml&quot;&gt;backlash&lt;/a&gt; has already started...
<![CDATA[
<br /><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-12058&amp;itemDate=2003-06-30+11%3A41%3A29&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Rodney+Welch+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up"><img border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?feedUrl=http%3A//blogcritics.org/index.xml&amp;itemLink=http%3A%2F%2Fblogcritics.org%2Farchives%2F2003%2F06%2F30%2F101432.php%23comment-12058&amp;itemDate=2003-06-30+11%3A41%3A29&amp;itemTitle=Comment+by+Rodney+Welch+on+Mel%27s+Movie+gets+Focus+on+Family+Thumbs+up" /></a>
]]>
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12058@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 11:41:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>