<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Oprah, I'm on yo side!</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:42:30 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jerry</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/20/021459.php#comment-104920</link>
<description>Oprah is not the savior of the literary world.  She has every publishing company, self-serving writer, and pseudo-literature-snob (including those who don&#039;t know how to spell Steinbeck) kowtowed to her pathetically corporate label.  While Oprah has gotten millions of mindless and muumuued housewives to pick up books without pictures of celebrities, the literary world has become more a competition to please Saint Oprah (and thereby publishing companies) than an endeavor to create good art.  Steinbeck must be rolling in his grave.  And while you may diss Harry Potter, I must say that that now-pimple-faced wizard is one of the few good things in commercial literature nowadays.  For the first time in my life-time, kids are excited about reading.  Potter-author Rowling may be the gateway for millions of young people to actually pick up a Steinbeck novel of their own accord and not because someone like Oprah tells them so.  Who cares about the housewives?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">104920@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:42:30 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lyz</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/20/021459.php#comment-11621</link>
<description>Well she is a smart cookie, I hear she won a national debate tournament in high school.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11621@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 01:45:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The Theory</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/20/021459.php#comment-11619</link>
<description>i am quite pleased with Oprah&#039;s pick.

and i like watching her show occationally. she seems so outgoing and real and friendly. only god knows if she&#039;s like that off stage, but one can pretend! hah.

peace.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11619@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:58:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lyz</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/20/021459.php#comment-11614</link>
<description>I have often been dissapointed by classics (ahem Bleak House). We will see how Oprah does with the classics, if she just goes for the standards or digs deeper for the lesser known gems such as The Heart is a Lonely Hunter. Should be interesting.
Oh and I totally Oprah is a spaz and it scares me that if she started a religion millions of middle aged women would convert and drink her kool aid.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11614@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 00:19:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Murphy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/20/021459.php#comment-11600</link>
<description>You know, I liked that Oprah did contemporary books. Because it&#039;s good to give credit to the time we are in now.

But then, those classics are so damn good! I haven&#039;t read East of Eden specifically, but I have never been let down by choosing books considered classics.

I think that maybe she should switch off.

Who would that hurt?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11600@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2003 16:18:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Murphy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/20/021459.php#comment-11599</link>
<description>You know, I liked that Oprah did contemporary books. Because it&#039;s good to give credit to the time we are in now.

But then, those classics are so damn good! I haven&#039;t read East of Eden specifically, but I have never been let down by choosing books considered classics.

I think that maybe she should switch off.

Who would that hurt?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11599@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2003 16:18:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/20/021459.php#comment-11476</link>
<description>Oh, and I meant to say that she also tends to pick pretty good books for her club, both before and now. Bravo for her!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11476@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:38:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Phillip Winn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/20/021459.php#comment-11475</link>
<description>I have &lt;b&gt;very&lt;/b&gt; mixed feelings about Oprah. First of all, I&#039;m a man, and some people dismiss my thoughts on Oprah as a result, which I think is a mistake, but what do I know? After all, I&#039;m a man... and so on.

Second of all, she has the goofiest weirdo spiritualist whack-jobs on her show occasionally, and said fruit loops spend an hour saying very simple things they read from Ben Franklin&#039;s almanacs wrapped in New Age terms. It wears on me.

&lt;b&gt;But&lt;/b&gt; she often has marvelous guests and covers great topics. I have often said that I would enjoy Oprah&#039;s show if it wasn&#039;t for Oprah herself. She&#039;ll have a great guest and then she won&#039;t shut up and let the guest talk. It&#039;s awful. Especially when she starts saying something ignorant that either has nothing to do with the guest or sometimes even directly contradicts him (though Oprah obviously doesn&#039;t realize it). What&#039;s the guest to do? He or she is on Oprah&#039;s turf, so they generally just nod and smile. 

I think it makes Oprah look ignorant, but oh well. I guess that&#039;s her shtick. Not reading the books, not researching the guest, etc, obviously works for her. I think she comes across as ignorant.

My wife jokes that Oprah has never met a guest she doesn&#039;t agree with wholeheartedly. Today: Evangelical Christian Bible-Thumpers. Tomorrow: Athiests For Shiva. And Oprah loves them both profoundly, stating that each has changed her life.

Argh! And yet still I catch the show on Tivo sometimes. A recent show on diabetes and heart disease, for example, was excellent overall.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11475@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:37:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michelle</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/20/021459.php#comment-11467</link>
<description>What a beautiful little manifesto! I&#039;d sign this right away;-)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11467@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2003 06:53:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>