Moneyball by Michael Lewis

Written by Stephen Silver
Published June 18, 2003
page 1 | 2

The book is at its best in describing Beane in the "war room" prior to and during the amateur draft, as well as on the "trading desk" prior to the trading deadline, bringing us into a major part of baseball success that is rarely if ever covered. And in the couple of occasions that he brings us actual play-by-play coverage of games, Lewis (previously known primarily as a business/Wall Street journalist) proves an exciting storyteller.

The book isn't without its glaring weaknesses, however- and foremost among them is the author's hagiographic, almost messianic worship of his subject. If Beane has ever been wrong or made a mistake in his time as GM, or if there's a single weakness anywhere in sabermetric theory, we don't learn about it in "Moneyball." Also, for a book called "Moneyball," Lewis devotes very little attention to baseball's overall economic picture: that there was nearly a player strike in 2002 is, I believe, not even mentioned, and the longrunning three-headed battle among the union, large-market owners, and small-market owners is barely even touched upon. And how does Lewis explain the similar success in 2002 of the Minnesota Twins, who played (and beat) Oakland in the playoffs despite an equally low payroll- only without the benefit of any sabermetric influence whatsoever?

My friend and fellow blogger Jeremy Wahlman recently met Lewis at a book-signing and asked him why the A's have never attempted to attack the small-market problem from the demand (rather than supply) side: why not try harder to increase revenues? Why not pursue a new stadium (another thing that is, I believe, not mentioned in the book)? What about the whispers that small-market owners have always lied about their revenues? Lewis, I believe, acted as though those questions had never even occurred to him.

Overall, however, "Moneyball" is a fascinating and worthwhile read. Clearly, baseball is on a collision course: in five years, either every team in the sport will have embraced sabermetrics, or it will be dismissed as a fad, sort of like what the run-and-shoot offense was for baseball. But one thing is for certain- whether or not Billy Beane stays in Oakland (he nearly departed for Boston last year) sabermetrics in baseball is likely to last, on some level, for quite a long time- quite possibly longer than neoconservatism does in the White House.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Moneyball by Michael Lewis
Published: June 18, 2003
Type:
Section: Books
Writer: Stephen Silver
Stephen Silver's BC Writer page
Stephen Silver's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Stephen Silver
All Books Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 19, 2003 @ 00:12AM — Howard Owens [URL]

Good post ... I'm going to link to it ... tomorrow is my birthday, and the expected present is "Moneyball" ... can't wait.

#2 — February 7, 2005 @ 10:49AM — scavongelli

Is there a book that applies James' theories to football ?

#3 — May 9, 2006 @ 15:42PM — tony Skillen [URL]

Great review but I need to check what sabermetrics is and how it's a `philosophy'

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/6276)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments