<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on <i>Frailty</i></title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:01:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Matt Moore</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/16/051237.php#comment-11248</link>
<description>(MORE SPOILS)

Yea, I kinda agree with you, it was obvious. But I thought that wasn&#039;t really a twist ending, it was just something that was there the whole time (and to tell the truth, I found it kinda remarkable for a movie to just allow a religious explanation to be true. A supernatural explanation I&#039;ll buy from Hollywood...). I thought the twist ending was when he admitted he was really his brother, and I for one didn&#039;t see that coming.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11248@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:01:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Doctor Slack</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/16/051237.php#comment-11247</link>
<description>(SPOILERY)

I can offer one possible reason why Frailty hasn&#039;t garnered much recognition -- the entire story is based on a surprise plot twist which is visible half a mile off, especially if you&#039;ve ever read any Stephen King. From well before Bill Paxton&#039;s character was killed, I was muttering to myself &quot;a-ha, it&#039;s all gonna turn out to be &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt;.&quot; I was disappointed to be proved right.

It wasn&#039;t a bad movie, but I wouldn&#039;t go out of my way to see it again.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11247@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:56:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>