<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on 28 Days Later</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:55:14 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Flea Rosca</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/15/213147.php#comment-11461</link>
<description>this is a joke right? it&#039;s not a sequel to the Sandra Bullock film.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11461@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2003 01:55:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Peter Petrisko</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/15/213147.php#comment-11272</link>
<description>That review is too funny.

I guess &quot;28 Days Later&quot; is more cautionary tale than comedy...

You start drinking, and the next thing you know you&#039;re like the walking dead and start eating human flesh.

And the next morning you&#039;re hung over, and your friends tell you what you did.

And you&#039;re like, &quot;I ate WHAT??? Damn, I must&#039;ve been really really wasted!&quot;
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11272@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2003 02:52:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>