Vampire Slaying now and then

Written by Michelle Dittrich
Published June 15, 2003
page 1 | 2

Joss Whedon, whom fans now and then like to call "God" (no blashemy intended), wrote the script for the film. His father wrote for the "Golden Girls", Joss himself belonged to the writing team of "Roseanne" - even there is special sense of humor is evident on the show. In 1992 he writes the script for "Buffy the Vampire Slayer", finding it funny to make the stupid blonde girl, that normally dies in the first five minutes, a superhero and save the world. However, his script didn't look onscreen as he had intended it to look. And he's right, the movie has a high trash-factor. Although there are a large number of great names on the cast list (Kristy Swanson, Luke Perry, Donald Sutherland, Rutger Hauer and later Oscar-winner Hilary Swank), you don't feel for the characters. Only Donald Sutherland can give his old mysterious character Merrick a charming note. But neither Kristy Swanson in the leading role nor Luke Perry as the mostly goodlooking sidekick and damsel in distress (as he calls himself) can bring life to their characters. Even Rutger Hauer seems to be rather bored. His Lotus has too much pathos and is desperately missing an ironic touch. Perhaps Hauer was only shellshocked about his terrible wig (a tradition Joss Whedon liked to continue on the later series with terrible Angelus-hairdos) and couldn't concentrate on his performance.

Yet, even in this early film you can already see trails of the later so legendary Slayer Slang. Buffy has a quick tongue and can always come up with a witty reply.

Interesting are the similarities and differences between film and later series. The character of the Watcher is highly mystified: Donald Sutherland appears as a wise leader who is reborn every time a Slayer needs to be trained for her mission. On the other hand, in the series Anthony Stewart Head as Giles is part of a strictly organised Council (see "Highlander" or Anne Rice) that collects information about vampires, demons and monsters over the centuries. Yet the series always tried to tie the knot with the earlier film. More than once incidents from the film are mentioned and one episode ("Becoming") even featured a modified scene from the film (when Merrick tells Buffy about her destiny).

Having had the trash factor always in mind I was now positively surprised to watch the film again. The witty language, the quick replies, the irony - all that reminds me of the later series and why I loved it. So, after all, I don't regret buying the DVD to complete my Buffy collection... and you should do that, too;-)

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Vampire Slaying now and then
Published: June 15, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Horror, Video: Comedy
Writer: Michelle Dittrich
Michelle Dittrich's BC Writer page
Michelle Dittrich's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Michelle Dittrich
Video: Horror
Video: Comedy
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 15, 2003 @ 21:44PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

I remember reading an interview with Joss Whedon where he said he watched the movie of "Buffy" in a theatre and cried.

That said, watch "Alien 4" and compare it to "Firefly" for some home semiotic fun.

#2 — June 16, 2003 @ 07:15AM — Michelle [URL]

I haven't seen "Alien 4" because of lack of interest. And I didn't search for "Firefly" yet (I'm in Germany), because I'm simply to lazy;-) But at least the latter I would like to see sometime soon.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/6204)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments