<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Dagon - Making Lovecraft Proud From Beyond the Grave</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2003 07:44:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by James Russell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/10/061437.php#comment-11179</link>
<description>There were a few James adaptations for British television in the 1960s and 1970s. The BFI has lately released a couple of them on DVD. There was a more recent series hosted by Christopher Lee which adapted a number of James stories.

Of feature film adaptations, IMDB only lists two (one of them Jacques Tourner&#039;s &lt;I&gt;Night of the Demon&lt;/i&gt;).</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11179@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2003 07:44:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Sarah e.g.</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/10/061437.php#comment-11112</link>
<description>After delighting in James, Machen, Lefanu and Blackwood, I&#039;m just starting to get into Lovecraft. Good Lord, how I love this subgenre. 
Has any of M.R. James&#039; stuff ever been dramatized (besides on the radio)? 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11112@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2003 03:54:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Frank Giovinazzi</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/10/061437.php#comment-11104</link>
<description>James and Bob - Thanks for the comments, especially the film being based on SOI.

I haven&#039;t read either story in a while, but for me the impact of the movie was its ability to capture Lovecraft&#039;s conception of horror.

And let&#039;s face it -- some of the rubber masks on the fish people were unintentionally hilarious -- like the bad facial hair in the movie, Gettysburg.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11104@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2003 02:37:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Frank Giovinazzi</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/10/061437.php#comment-11103</link>
<description>James and Bob - Thanks for the comments, especially the film being based on SOI.

I haven&#039;t read either story in a while, but for me the impact of the movie was its ability to capture Lovecraft&#039;s conception of horror.

And let&#039;s face it -- some of the rubber masks on the fish people were unintentionally hilariuos -- like the bad facial hair in the movie, Gettysburg.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11103@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2003 02:37:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by James Russell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/10/061437.php#comment-11101</link>
<description>But, of course, the insertion of &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; female figure into a Lovecraft adaptation is a change from the original :)

Saw the film last night, will have a review later.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">11101@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2003 01:37:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bob Mozark</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/10/061437.php#comment-10914</link>
<description>This movie is actually more based on Lovecraft&#039;s novella &quot;Shadow Over Innsmouth&quot; than his short story for which it is named, &quot;Dagon&quot;.  The movie manages to remain true to the spirit of SOI, despite bringing it forward from the 1920s to the present day and changing the setting of the fishing village from Massachusetts to Spain.  I, too, watched it first on the Sci Fi Channel and then purchased the DVD, which contains a fair amount of blood-drenched nudity in the climatic scenes involving the hero&#039;s significant other (her addition being another change from the original story). </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10914@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:23:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by James Russell</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/06/10/061437.php#comment-10892</link>
<description>Cool. This is a film I really need to check out, especially since I&#039;ve discovered it&#039;s actually been released here. As a Lovecraft fan I know the disappointments that Lovecraft-derived movies tend to be, but I&#039;ve heard some not bad reports of this one...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">10892@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2003 06:29:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>