Raines Out on Proverbial Ass
Published June 05, 2003
Mr. Lelyveld has been active as a freelance writer since his departure from The Times, writing for The New York Review of Books, The New Yorker and The New York Times Magazine.
His book, "Move Your Shadow," which described decades of racial turmoil in South Africa and reflected his two assignments there, won the Pulitzer Prize for nonfiction in 1986. He also won numerous awards for his reporting, including two George Polk Memorial Awards, and received a Guggenheim Fellowship.
Mr. Raines, 60, became executive editor of The New York Times in 2001, after having served as editorial page editor of The Times since 1993. Previously he had been Washington bureau chief since 1988 and bureau chief in London since 1987.
From 1985 until 1987, Mr. Raines served as deputy Washington editor. Before that he was the chief national political correspondent in 1984, a White House correspondent from 1981 until 1984, and Atlanta bureau chief from 1979 until 1981. He joined The Times in 1978 as a national correspondent in Atlanta.
Mr. Raines won the Pulitzer Prize in feature writing in 1992 for "Grady's Gift," a personal reflection that appeared in The New York Times Magazine.
Mr. Boyd, 52, was named managing editor of The New York Times in 2001, after having served as deputy managing editor for news since 1997. Before that, Mr. Boyd had been assistant managing editor from 1993 until 1997.
Mr. Boyd also served as the co-senior editor of The Times's "How Race is Lived in America" series, which was published in 2000 and was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting in the following year. [press release] Raines can fish all he wants now.
- Raines Out on Proverbial Ass
- Published: June 05, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Culture
- Filed Under: Culture: Media
- Writer: Eric Olsen
- Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
- Eric Olsen's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I will quote you Mike, and you're right.
How many of those seven Pulitzers were based on false reporting? Or on the work of those who received no credit for it?
Ah well, Mike is right. The NY Times is still an amazing paper with high standards overall, and while this went on longer than it should have, and while there are other complaints about the paper, the world is still a better place for it's continued general excellence. Perhaps with Raines gone, it will again attain its foremost position in the world.






We all bitch about the New York Times-it's one of my favorite hobbies-but the truth is The Times sets a standard for other papers, most of which are terribly mediocre. So this is long overdue. There's nothing more important than preserving the paper's integrity, especially in the face of all the media consolidation. If Murdoch were to get his hands on it, it would go the way of his other elite possession, the London Times-still good, but way off the mark set in its glory days.
And you can quote me on that.