Information Nausea

Written by Frank Giovinazzi
Published June 03, 2003

I suspect that like a lot of heavy Internet surfers, I've been spending huge chunks of productive time obsessively going to sites that add little to my productivity.

Actually, I know I have, it's just that I'm afraid to do a real time audit on what percentage of my days this actiivty has gnawed out of my life.

So I deleted at least half of my favorites from the browser, and am going cold turkey on anything that doesn't add to what I'm actually supposed to be doing.

Of course, I am excepting Blogcritics from this, because there are plenty of posts where I can learn something, or pick up on things that are helpful. News sites are also exempted, because a healthy news diet does contribute to what I'm doing.

But many things don't — for example, I had a habit of checking Romenesko's at Poynter Online several times a day, "to keep up on the media business," I told myself.

But that was an excuse — most of the site is simple gossip — a running blog of wrongdoings and so-called developments that do nothing to advance my career. Instead, what it did was give me a false sense of involvement in the larger media world. I was fooling myself — the only way to be part of something, for real, is to contribute actual work. Not just being able to talk about it, which is nothing but shallow factoid possession.

Deleting the sites is already making me feel cleaner, like after a haircut or a trip to the dentist.

What I've become interested in lately — after hours of surfing and saying to myself, there's nothing on, are sites that are constructive. Teach me something I don't know, point me to information or skills that I would do well to acquire, show me how to become more of the person I want to be.

This doesn't mean the stuff I elect to read has to be high-falutin'. For example, I've been doing some construction and landscaping projects, and have found a few sites that traffic in how-to information. Stuff as simple as germinating seeds or how to use an arc welder.

It just seems the Internet was made for more than gossip.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Information Nausea
Published: June 03, 2003
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Frank Giovinazzi
Frank Giovinazzi's BC Writer page
Frank Giovinazzi's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Frank Giovinazzi
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 3, 2003 @ 14:42PM — Ben [URL]

I wasted so much time on the internet in school, I guess that I still do while I'm very busy not finding a job. I'd argue that any site that encourages creative thought, or creative action is not a waste - although it may be a misdirection of energy.

#2 — June 3, 2003 @ 15:33PM — Temple Stark [URL]

That is so true. I mean I heard about this one lady who killed her husband in Robenoke after he wouldn't let her check her e-mail.

And this other guy wanted to go for the record for continuous chat but had an aneurysm after 28 hours and the 200th person claimed he or she was an "18-year-old hottie ready for anything."

The Internet. Full of Gossip.
:)

#3 — September 29, 2006 @ 00:08AM — Steve

Well, as one who has continuously owned computers and used them to build a carreer since around 1982, I can say that computers have ALWAYS had a propensity to make one squander productive time.

I'm not talking about gaming - that's recreation and one I've never taken to. Like Frank, I'm talking about fooling oneself into thinking that keeping up with the latest, minute-by-minute, was an imperative; that it was educational and would give one an edge in one's endeavours.

Now, in the early days, before the internet, computer technolgy itself WAS the latest, so basically us computer geeks tended to be the only afflicted. We'd read a crude manual, then keenly fiddle with hardware and software to make a printer reproduce the company's logo on envelopes - ignoring the fact the company had thousands of pre-printed envelopes they'd take ten years to use up anyway.

Today, with the Internet, everyone is vulnerable to the same kind of seduction. Nevertheless, it's not really new. Television has been doing the same thing for decades before the first home computers came along.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/5852)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments