LOTR: the musical

Written by James Russell
Published June 01, 2003

Can you see this working?

While the world waits for the final installment in the "Lord of the Rings" film trilogy ("The Return of the King" is due Dec. 17), producers are at work on a stage version.
The world's first major musical of the "Lord of the Rings" will feature a cast of 50, lavish sets and a full orchestra - at a price tag of $13 million.

If we've learned nothing from the respective film versions of the book by Ralph Bakshi and Peter Jackson, it's that to adapt LOTR properly you need hours and hours and hours to tell the story. Unless the producers of this stage version are planning something of Wagnerian dimensions, I can't see this working very well.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
LOTR: the musical
Published: June 01, 2003
Type:
Section: Music
Writer: James Russell
James Russell's BC Writer page
James Russell's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by James Russell
All Music Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 1, 2003 @ 11:04AM — murphy [URL]

umm..yeah.

It ain't the Lion King

#2 — June 1, 2003 @ 15:42PM — Phillip Winn [URL]

I was surprised when I first that The Lion King was on Broadway. Isn't that a Disney movie? But you're right, at least TLK was a musical to begin with...

#3 — June 2, 2003 @ 08:29AM — James Russell

And it wasn't a thousand-odd pages long, either...

#4 — June 2, 2003 @ 08:31AM — Phillip Winn [URL]

It seemed like it. Sorry, I wasn't really a fan. :)

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/5782)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments