Al Jazeera - "The Independent Arab Voice"?

Written by Eric Olsen
Published May 30, 2003

Hardly, with at least three paid moles for Saddam:

    On Tuesday, when al Jazeera fired its director general, Mohammed Jassem al-Ali, the world was reminded once again of one significant reason--Saddam Hussein's regime infiltrated media outlets throughout the region, including al Jazeera.

    According to a dispatch from Agence France Presse, hardly a pro-American outlet, al-Ali was canned after the Sunday Times of London reported earlier this month on documents uncovered linking him and two other al Jazeera employees to Saddam's regime. Al Jazeera has confirmed the report of Al-Ali's dismissal, but denies that he was let go because of suspicions about his ties to the Iraqi regime.

    On May 11, 2003, the Mirror's Marie Coyle wrote: "A document headed 'Presidency of the Republic, Mukhabarat Service,' indicates apparent contact between the intelligence agency and Mohammed Jasim Al-Ali, the station's managing director." While Coyle reported that there was not yet evidence that al-Ali had been paid off, the documents directly implicated two other al Jazeera employees.

    ....The efforts of the regime to win propaganda were hardly limited to al Jazeera. The CIA report, along with firsthand accounts from Arab journalists, paints a troubling picture of the Arab media coverage--or, as important, lack of coverage--of the Iraqi regime.

    The Iraqi Ministry of Information, under the guidance of Uday and Tariq Aziz, "focused on determining the stories to be pushed, and assigning Iraqi resources overseas to conduct media operations." The Information Ministry coordinated its efforts with the Iraqi Intelligence Service (the Mukhabarat), which, according to the CIA report, "participates in the internal decision-making process, recruits media and other assets, delivers propaganda material and instructions to them, and provides payoffs. A variety of reporting indicates that journalists in the Middle East and Europe have been recruited to assist Iraq." [Weekly Standard]

"Fair"? "Balanced?" Bullshit. When I think about the accusations of the American media of being propaganda outlets for the administration, then read something like this, I laugh until my nose bleeds. Most of the world still doesn't even comprehend the concept of an "independent press." I do give al Jazeera a small amount of credit for firing the prick, very small. They still can't admit he was a shill for a Stalinist babyraper.

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Al Jazeera - "The Independent Arab Voice"?
Published: May 30, 2003
Type:
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Culture: Media, Video: News, Video: Television
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
Culture: Media
Video: News
Video: Television
All Culture Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 30, 2003 @ 16:56PM — mike

Interesting. That is, as a textbook example of how prowars see in others the flaws they themselves possess. I'm glad to see the state-worshipping conservatives at The Weekly Standard took time out from writing Pentagon press releases to provide us with this piece of non-news. Al Jihad is in thrall to some nasty people? Who knew?

You say that most people in the world have no concept of an independent press. True, but that includes the citizens of the United States, unless they consult the small print in the back pages of some newspapers. Even the pro-war British media, like The Times of London, have offered a much more objective assessment of the war and its horrific aftermath than anything in the American media.

In his introduction to Animal Farm, Orwell said that brainwashing is often much more effective in a democracy, since conformity is imposed by institutions pretending to be objective. When the CIA covertly distributed Orwell's book during the Cold War, it struck that sentence. I think that sums up it up.

#2 — June 1, 2003 @ 20:46PM — button

Many people who have seen it say that their version of "Point-Counterpoint" is much better than our current version. I haven't seen either one. But who can forget: "Jane, you ignorant slut!"

Meanwhile, Al Bawaba is reporting today that Mo Al-Saef, the former Info Minister, is in very bad shape. It looks like his son, the doctor, is going to have to slip him a micky and get him out of there, maybe put him on a plane (under heavy sedation) and bring him back to Ireland with him.

#3 — June 2, 2003 @ 08:00AM — Eric Olsen

Well, best wishes to the Info Minister - I've read their "count-counterpoint"-type show involved much screaming pointing and waving.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/5743)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments