Blogcritics: Comments on Revisit Narnia

Comment by Usman

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:39:04 EDT

I liked the books. But there was something that kept itching me nearly all the way. It is, in its own *innocent* way, so very hostile to Islamic civilization in its golden ages. It is not unnatural, many writer do it all the time, but to expect such a thing from a good writer and cosidering that I liked the characters, underlined meanings and storyline this was most annoying and I feel sorry that ppl with such high talent are also somtimes blinded with falsehoods and narrow-mindedness

Comment by The Theory

Tue, 4 Nov 2003 11:39:17 EST

i have long been an advocate of the narnia series. The only book I haven't enjoyed as much as the rest was The Last Battle.

Comment by Lucy

Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:40:33 EST

I also thought "Out of the Silent Planet" was poor, kind of thrown together, however enjoyed the Narnia series, but my favorite work from Lewis was "The Screwtape Papers"....Pure, unadulterated genius. "Man's conquest of Nature turns out, in the moment of its consummation, to be Nature's conquest of Man" - C S LEWIS

Comment by Amber

Tue, 3 Jun 2003 11:47:33 EDT

I liked Perelandra the best of the SF trilogy. Plenty of heady stuff, as well as some action, and as ever, Lewis' overarticulate descriptions of environment. It was an awesome book. Out of the SIlent Planet sucked though. I couldn't make it through. Earth is too boring, I guess.

Comment by Phillip Winn

Tue, 3 Jun 2003 07:52:46 EDT

I have always generally enjoyed books with a langorous approach to plotting and memorable characters. I'll never forget the Janet Reno-like character Ransom deal with. Also, I was very much taken with the Golden Age of SF stuff, and Random traveling through space in a box really felt like that to me. I've read them once again since, and still I was taken with them. I guess it's something like how I feel about Atlast Shrugged - I can find faults with the skill of the author, but the story is compelling for its parallels. Does that make sense? It's early, maybe I'm not expressing myself well.

Comment by Michael Croft

Tue, 3 Jun 2003 02:39:20 EDT

I thought it was rotten what he did to Susan in the last book. Never got over that. We're definitely on different pages on the SF series. I found it at around age 14. I was an SF reader and I'd liked Narnia when I was younger. Bought all three and read them all, but never picked them up again. What did you like about them?

Comment by Phillip Winn

Mon, 2 Jun 2003 23:37:04 EDT

To be fair, chronological is Lewis' preferred order as well, but I still insist on starting with the book with which I started. After that I guess I'll go with chrono, backing up for Magician's Nephew and going from there. Since they're all published that way now, I can even remember the "right" way! :)

Comment by Phillip Winn

Sun, 1 Jun 2003 16:02:17 EDT

Michael (#1) Actually, American publisher now screw the series up by publishing it in chronological order, too. However, I've been reading them to my kids in the order in which they were written and published originally, the only correct way to read them. :) Of course, I also enjoy the SF trilogy, so that tells you from what different bases we're coming! I had a set as a kid, and I read them repeatedly until the covers came off. My wife bought me a set relatively recently, and I've read The Lion, The Witch And The Wardrobe to my kids already. Once I finish The Secret Garden, I'll start again with Narnia. Good stuff, even if a touch heavy-handed. Fortunately, the theology is actually bad in some places (IM!HO), so it's easy for me to tell my kids not to worry so much about the parallels. :)

Comment by murphy

Fri, 30 May 2003 07:37:41 EDT

I loved the Narnia books. They stand a repeated reading. Yes, the theology is heavy-handed. But then, you can get past it to see the theme of temptation and redemption independent of Christianity. For an adult, they are a very quick read. For a child, they are so beautifully written, not too long, so they let the child experience the joy of literacy.

Comment by Michael Croft

Thu, 29 May 2003 12:01:54 EDT

I liked these stories, too. I recommend reading them in the british (chronological) order instead of the american published order--Magician's nephew first. However, it is not unalloyed pleasure. The theology is pretty heavy-handed, so much so that I noticed it at age 10. It's not a Spencerian alegory or a Piers Anthony series, but it's a bit heavy. The early stories are better than the later ones. Much better. The Horse and His Boy has some troublesome moments and The Last Battle really bothered me. Bought 7, liked 5. That's not bad, all things considered. Another personal note: Don't let your enthusiasm for Narnia convince you that ~~Out of the Silent Planet~~ might be worthwhile. It's really awful.