Keep the Cuts
Published May 28, 2003
Many of these additions are nice to see from a fannish sort of standpoint. Some of the extra scenes fix omissions that had upset Tolkien purists quite a bit, and it's nice to see that the filmmakers were trying to be true to the books, and actually shot those bits. One or two of them are short enough that they really should've been left in-- cutting the "look fairer and seem fouler" line in particular was inexcusable-- it adds about five seconds to the scene, and provides some crucial character motivation.
In the end, though, books and films are different media, and the cuts made for the theatrical release were generally the right thing to do. The extra scenes are nice, and rue to the book, but they absolutely destroy the pacing of the film. The original cut was a nice piece of work, with tension building slowly and continuously through the entire film, with only very brief interludes of relative calm. The omitted material is mostly very talky, and not suspenseful in the least, and from a film standpoint, better left on the cutting-room floor.
There are a few cases out there where re-cutting a movie actually improves it-- the best known is probably Blade Runner, though in a weird way, I liked the voice-over in the original. I'm also told that there's a "Director's Cut" version of The Abyss where the ending doesn't suck large rocks through capillary tubing, but I can't verify that. We've also seen a re-edited version of The Big Sleep which actually makes sense-- the famously incomprehensible version that was originally released was the result of some star-driven pressure from the studio, and completely mangled the plot.
These cases are pretty rare, though. By and large, the people who make movies know what they're doing, and when they cut something out, it probably deserves to be left out. Throwing the extra footage onto the DVD release is a nice bonus for film buffs, but generally doesn't do anything to improve the original film.
(Having slagged the extra footage, though, I should note that the Ronin DVD is probably worth owning just to have the ability to cut directly to the car-chase scenes, and the coffee-cup ambush. And the four-disc Fellowship of the Ring set provides a wealth of other material that makes up for the somewhat shaky alternate footage. And, while we're on the topic, the Spinal Tap commentary tracks are brilliant-- I may be buying that one soon, as I don't presently own a copy...)
- Keep the Cuts
- Published: May 28, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Adventure, Video: Classics, Video: Comedy, Video: Fantasy, Video: Music, Video: SF
- Writer: Chad Orzel
- Chad Orzel's BC Writer page
- Chad Orzel's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Ugh! The extra footage in Fellowship improves the movie, in my view. That was cut for time, not for any good reason. Several things are more comprehensible for first-time viewers with the footage put back in.
On alternate endings, A Perfect Murder had several, one or more of which was probably every bit as good as the one they eventually went with.
But I think that the ending of The Abyss wasn't much improved by the alternate ending on the DVD. Maybe a little, but it was still pretty darn weak.
I'm with you on most "deleted scenes" and "alternate endings," but Fellowship is a different story. :)
I couldn't agree more with the point. One of the things that they often do with deleted scenes and director's cuts is spell out things that are better left unstated. The director's cut of "The Big Blue," for instance, adds about 15 minutes of footage which are absolute dead weight, transforming one of my favorite movies into a heavy-handed screed.
Ugh! The extra footage in Fellowship improves the movie, in my view. That was cut for time, not for any good reason. Several things are more comprehensible for first-time viewers with the footage put back in.
I think time is a valid reason to make cuts. Or, rather, pace is a good reason for cuts, and the two are closely related. It think the cuts made to Fellowship were made for reasons of pacing, and I think they were reasonable cuts to make. I haven't heard any real complaints about the lack of cut material from people who saw the movie without having read the books.
But I think that the ending of The Abyss wasn't much improved by the alternate ending on the DVD. Maybe a little, but it was still pretty darn weak.
Back when it was on HBO all the damn time, I remember thinking that the way to improve the ending of The Abyss would've been to cut a bunch of footage at the end, not add new footage, so I'm not surprised that additional material didn't help. (Specifically, it should've ended at the point where Ed Harris is carried into the alien city.)
And from the first comment:
I didn't think the original edit of The Big Sleep did that much to make it more comprehensible, since Raymond Chandler's plot was already pretty damn twisted in the book. Howard Hawks and Humphrey Bogart couldn't work out whether one characted was killed or killed himself, so they asked Chandler directly, with the latter replying that he had no idea.
The real improvement was in having a scene at the DA's office about halfway through where Marlowe lays out the whole plot to that point. It was a little talky, but cleared things up, and made sure all the viewers were on the same page before plunging on into the second half of the plot.
I was never all that bothered by the question of who killed the chauffeur-- for one thing, there's an explanation suggested in the book that would work just fine. I'm also not entirely sure I'd trust the "Chandler had no idea" story-- he made a few different statements along those lines, but I think he had tighter control of his plots than he let on...
Re: Ronin: "It's close, but the actual "alternate" ending is much, much worse."
I don't think that states it strongly enough.
I'm trying very hard to forget it actually existed at all, and not think it was a bit that really happened that we just didn't get shown (which my mind keeps wanting to characterize it as). That bit is so bad that it's in danger of retroactively ruining the movie for me. I HATED HATED HATED it, and anyone who even remotely liked the (non-voiceover parts of the) ending should avoid it at all costs.
*deep breath*
On _Fellowship_: "look fairer and seem fouler" should have stayed in, and taking it out made Frodo look stupid and ineffectual. A trend the movie went for, I admit (Weathertop, for instance), but I didn't like it. "It's Mr Bilbo's trolls!" also should have stayed in, I think.
The one longish scene that I thought added something was the argument towards the end where Boromir accused Aragorn of forsaking his human heritage for elfdom. I thought this made the "_our_ people" bit during Boromir's death scene more powerful: it made it much more concrete to me that Aragorn has reached a turning point.
I thought everything else should have been left out. The opening dragged really badly, and Lothlorien just killed all momentum and left it hanging from a tree. Though I think the movie screwed up Lothlorien anyway, so maybe I just wanted to get out of there.









I didn't think the original edit of The Big Sleep did that much to make it more comprehensible, since Raymond Chandler's plot was already pretty damn twisted in the book. Howard Hawks and Humphrey Bogart couldn't work out whether one characted was killed or killed himself, so they asked Chandler directly, with the latter replying that he had no idea.