<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on The Ring</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2003 11:58:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by cjones on The Ring</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/16/201743.php#comment-9626</link>
<description>Strangely enough - I found the others quite boring. Although I have heard others liked it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">9626@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2003 11:58:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by James Russell on The Ring</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/16/201743.php#comment-9617</link>
<description>I&#039;ve not seen the remake, but the Japanese original is an intriguing and creepy thing. If the Japanese sequel also gets remade, that will probably explain some parts of the first film better...</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">9617@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2003 04:47:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>