<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on The Matrix Reviewed</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 May 2003 04:08:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Michael Levy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/16/013207.php#comment-9649</link>
<description>[bigtime spoilers alert--do not read this until you&#039;ve seen the movie]

&lt;i&gt;At one point in the movie Neo learns that while he is &quot;The One,&quot; his destiny isn&#039;t the destruction of the Matrix, it&#039;s to maintain it. Yet in order for Man to beat the machines Neo will have to go against his destiny.&lt;/i&gt;

No, the Architect &lt;i&gt;wants&lt;/i&gt; Neo&#039;s destiny to be that, that is the plan.  But from the start Neo was destined to love Trinity as an individual instead of mankind as a whole--so he will refuse to take part in the destruction of Zion.  Destiny as a concept is not at all contradicted by that.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">9649@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2003 04:08:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>