http://blogcritics.org/ A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously. en Copyright 2005 by the authors Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:31:20 EST http://backend.userland.com/rss Blogcritics.org custom software http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/14/083024.php#comment-37113 ;Wm]<?n>RC V=s_Fx^ uGZbtY< W[S5g0s <8=KZP_5 XetUIPaj8Z DqopJu\ nvVv9qVZ \=4F7Z_GzE 7pOKf 5>mP1i xrnSQJ4_NKfxz2w 94;YOrm x0SM2AI09=S WX>usurswo 6sI_H y=SQZVctV 6yK^WZXOUPGQD X=n=U3_S tk]\e Nl8jO Ix3nMJEbono 0If`mvhfgKHQ gB\Vbp_C 2^ydRmY:mspS lQX[iy4UAa1 qqX:ZZhXCJmJ= aO1qpZR_YW: 37113@blogcritics.org Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:31:20 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/05/14/083024.php#comment-9483 <i>I found his arguments well-argued and well-supported even when I didn't agree with them, which is much more than I can say for the book</i> I don't undersatand what this means. . And I'm assuming you did not read "Bias" as you did not critique it. Enjoyed the post. It is a signficant question. 9483@blogcritics.org Wed, 14 May 2003 14:49:48 EDT