Bush vs. Bush

Written by RJ Elliott
Published May 03, 2003

I'm getting a little tired of the comparisons being drawn between Bush 41 and Bush 43. From what the talking heads would have us believe, their Presidencies are nearly identical. In truth, they're a little like the two most famous versions of The Last Supper (by da Vinci and Tintoretto): Just about the only thing they have in common is their name. Bush 43 is a lot more like Reagan, or JFK, or LBJ, or even Teddy Roosevelt than he is like his dad.

Let's look at some key points:

- The first Bush raised taxes; the current Bush cut them.

- The first Bush came into office as one of the most experienced hands in Washington, particularly with regard to foreign affairs; the current Bush was relatively inexperienced and couldn't even name the leader of Pakistan.

- The first Bush built a full-sized coalition to fight a half-assed war against Iraq; the current Bush built a half-assed coalition to fight a full-scale war against Iraq.

- The first Bush was a one-termer. The current Bush looks nearly unstoppable in 2004, barring disaster.

Thoughts?

RJ Elliott is a graduate student studying Criminal Justice at the University Of Central Florida. His likes include nature, sports, and pierced blondes. He dislikes daytime television, left-wing dictators, and lead-tainted Chinese imports. He is ambivalent about Angelina Jolie.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Bush vs. Bush
Published: May 03, 2003
Type:
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Media
Writer: RJ Elliott
RJ Elliott's BC Writer page
RJ Elliott's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by RJ Elliott
Culture: Media
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 3, 2003 @ 20:17PM — Michael Croft [URL]

"The current Bush looks nearly unstoppable in 2004, barring disaster."

Just you keep thinking that. It's not very different from assessments of his father's presidency in May of 1991. Or of "anyone who doesn't drool on stage"'s odds against WJC in 1996.

The president, generally wrongly, gets a lot of credit or blame for the state of the economy. And running against a republican congress may not be so easy.

I'm hoping it's an interesting campaign, not an inevitable annointing. Here's to the future.

JMC

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/5042)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments