The Cassini Division
Published April 30, 2003
So, all in all, the book pretty much met my expectations. The main attraction, as suggested by the threads that it spawns with its cousins, is found in the political systems inhabited by the characters. Given the poor mode-matching between the book's focus and my personal interests, it was pretty much doomed to fail- I was basically unimpressed by the writing and plotting.
So, as a review, my conclusion has to be "It's a book that will be well liked by those who like that sort of thing." There's no denying that the social and political systems depicted for the Solar Union and New Mars are cleverly constructed, and if speculation about anarchist utopias is your thing, this is the book for you. The plot ends up being a bit thin due to all the time spent on the politics, and the whiz-bang ending doesn't really make up for that, so if you're after rollicking politicized space opera, you'd be better off digging up some old Heinlein.
Thoughts? Comments? I probably won't bother with any of his other books unless a fair number of people I trust tell me that the balance between politics and plot shifts between this book and the others.
(Originally posted at The Library of Babel.)
- The Cassini Division
- Published: April 30, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Books
- Filed Under: Books: Politics and Affairs, Books: SF
- Writer: Chad Orzel
- Chad Orzel's BC Writer page
- Chad Orzel's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us




Well, I've never read his stuff, but I always liked Ursula K. leGuin's The Dispossessed, about an anarchist "utopia" on a moon circling a capitalist planet. It was interesting without being overly didactic. I'm showing my age here. I haven't read an sf novel in eons, except perhaps Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow, which in my view is an overpraised and bloated work.