<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Frank Zappa "Brown Shoes Don't Make It"</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 1 May 2003 17:02:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Bill Sherman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/30/070232.php#comment-8949</link>
<description>&lt;I&gt;&quot;We see in the back of the City Hall mind&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

You&#039;re probably right on that mildly misheard lyric, Dave, but either way it still places the lyrical focus on the fantasizing &lt;I&gt;mind&lt;/I&gt; of the song&#039;s subject. 

Neat Zappa gif.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8949@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2003 17:02:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/30/070232.php#comment-8943</link>
<description>&lt;h2&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arf.ru/Notes/Afree/bshoes.html&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s&lt;/h2&gt; ...some more material on B.S.D.M.I., focusing more on the music than the lyrics.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8943@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2003 16:28:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Dave</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/30/070232.php#comment-8940</link>
<description>&quot;We see in the back of the &lt;b&gt;City Hall&lt;/b&gt; mind&quot;

&lt;img src=http://globalia.net/donlope/fz/images/g-l-o-v-e.gif&gt;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8940@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2003 16:24:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill Sherman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/30/070232.php#comment-8909</link>
<description>And one more thing (okay, here&#039;s where I get obsessive in supporting my interpretation), the girl of our anti-hero&#039;s dreams doesn&#039;t start out being his daughter, but changes into her halfway through the fantasy.  &quot;If she were my daughter I&#039;d - ,&quot; our lecher muses, while a previously unheard li&#039;l girl voice chirps up with &quot;What would you do, Daddy?&quot;  The answer &amp;ndash; smother her in chocolate syrup &amp;ndash; is sung as both &quot;girl&quot; and &quot;daughter&quot; by the band at the same time:  we&#039;re hearing the guy revise his sordid masturbatory fantasy as he creates it.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8909@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2003 09:59:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill Sherman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/30/070232.php#comment-8906</link>
<description>The lines that tell me otherwise (they&#039;re not reprinted in the album&#039;s lyric sheet, interestingly) are:

&quot;We see in the back of the city, a mind;
A dream of a girl about thirteen:
Off with her clothes and into a bed
Where she tickles his fancy all night long.&quot;

Zappa was definitely capable of being literal about sex in his songs, but I still think this &#039;un is more ambiguous.  A great composition either way, though. . .
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8906@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 May 2003 09:47:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/30/070232.php#comment-8851</link>
<description>Oh no.  It&#039;s intended quite literally except for the specifically wishful fantasy &quot;I&#039;d like to make her do a nasty on the White House lawn.&quot;

Note that the wife is gone (attending an orchid show).  Note the reference to the girl&#039;s misery: &quot;She&#039;s only 13 and I hear she gets loaded.&quot;  That&#039;s not his fantasy, that&#039;s the negative impact of his depravity.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8851@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:32:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill Sherman</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/30/070232.php#comment-8817</link>
<description>But does the dirty ol&#039; politico of &quot;Brown Shoes&quot; really do the deed with that nastynastynasty li&#039;l girl?  Zappa&#039;s not that clear:  we&#039;re told it&#039;s a &quot;dream of a girl about thirteen,&quot; and that we&#039;re entering a &quot;world of secret hungers/perverting the men who make your laws.&quot;  I&#039;ve always taken the song as tis slimewad&#039;s fantasy (&quot;I&#039;m gonna make her do the nasty on the White House lawn&quot;), not the more explicit pervo realization that we got in later period Zappa. . .</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">8817@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:58:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>