South Park and sympathy for social conservatives

Written by Al Barger
Published April 27, 2003
page 1 | 2

I don't have a full answer for the perfectly reasonable concerns of social conservatives such as Mr. Santorum. There really isn't one. We're dealing with the fallibility of human nature.

My best response comes from South Park, and the aforementioned "Death Camp of Tolerance" episode (perhaps their best ever). They made a big point of distinguishing between "tolerance" vs "acceptance." In their typically practical analysis, they understand that tolerance means that we have to "put up with" lots of behavior that we find inappropriate. That does not mean that we have to accept all things equally, or pretend to believe in cheap egalitarian moral equivalence.

It may not be as simple as instituting a police state, but we just have to rely mostly on non-coercive social persuasion to gently point our brethren in the right direction. Trying to set a good example and positively talking your own family and friends into constructive choices have to be the main ways things are done in a free society.

Secondarily, the stick of ostracism is a fair fallback position in egregious cases. You may have a right to destroy yourself with booze, but I have the equal right to dissociate from you. Stay away from me with your nonsense. I'm not having any of it. At some point, you're going to be on your own. You can just go off in the gutter and die. They're only going to be improving the gene pool by getting out of it.

From a legal, political level, the most thing you can legitimately do to enforce reasonable life choices is simply not to publicly subsidize stupidity. You screw up, you clean it up yourself. You may have a right to smoke crack, but you don't have a right to demand that I pay for your detox, or pay your rent because you're too stoned to hold down a job. If you want help, then you'll have to convince individuals to voluntarily support you- which will probably mean making some voluntary commitment to doing things to help yourself.

Supposed "tolerance" can also turn into fear and fascism. In South Park, the boys end up in a nazi-fied programming camp for the crime of being disgusted by the sight of their teacher's deviant sexual practices. Likewise, there hangs a pall over many American workplaces at the risk of being judged to have created a "hostile work environment" for such crimes as passing around blonde jokes in emails. Not much actual tolerance going on here.

In short then, our best bet is to put up with each other as best we can. Your hate crime laws and your sodomy and drug laws have to go.

In a free society, some people are going to freely screw it up; some will flatly crash and burn. That's just part of the deal.

page 1 | 2
Unreformed hawkish Hoosier hillbilly and sometimes candidate Al Barger runs the still squeezin' down the psychodelic Kentucky moonshine at MoreThings.com, what with the paranoid religious visions and the Pentacostal music and visions of God and anarchy running amok and such. Somebody oughta call the cops to report his out of control freedom of conscience. Till they come to take him away somewhere where he can't hurt anyone else, you can check out his weekly column of NEW ALBUM RELEASES.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
South Park and sympathy for social conservatives
Published: April 27, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Comedy, Video: Animation
Writer: Al Barger
Al Barger's BC Writer page
Al Barger's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Al Barger
Video: Comedy
Video: Animation
All Video Articles
Al Barger's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — April 27, 2003 @ 23:47PM — Brian Flemming [URL]

Al,

You wrote.

    You may have a right to destroy yourself with booze, but I have the equal right to dissociate from you. Stay away from me with your nonsense. I'm not having any of it. At some point, you're going to be on your own. You can just go off in the gutter and die. They're only going to be improving the gene pool by getting out of it.


Ah, if only the people around George W. Bush when he was 40 years old and destroying his life with booze were like you. Then maybe he would have gone into a gutter and died instead of becoming president (although it would have been too late to improve the gene pool, as he had already spawned). Unfortunately, he was surrounded by people who cared about him (and saw an attractively vulnerable soul to win for Christ), and they helped him recover from his addiction.

Heartlessness is never around when you really need it.

#2 — April 28, 2003 @ 01:16AM — Al Barger [URL]

Again Brian with the constant and totally unwarranted hatefulness towards the president. Jebus.

Again, the willingness to let someone lie down in the bed they have made seems to vex you.

Now, from what I wrote above, obviously abandoning someone to their chosen fate is presented as a last resort, not a desirable first response. It is better to drop a loser from your life than to have them take you down too.

Liberals looking for something to be hateful about make a big deal of Dubya's drinking, but I don't see where it was ever anything severe. The biggest public thing was ONE very marginal DUI. Please. If that's the worst thing he did, we've got the cleanest living president ever.

It's not that I'm heartless, it's just that my resources are limited. Society in general and I in particular have only so many resources of money and time to go around. I would prefer to send MY money to help orphans in Rwanda rather than subisidize drug rehab for some fool Gore voter from Florida. Ha!

Class, your assignment: download and listen to Billy Joe Shaver explain about "People and Their Problems."

#3 — April 28, 2003 @ 02:32AM — Jim Walter

Al,
I've got to hand it to you. You make it seem as though South Park is the voice of "Tolerant" Gen X'ers. South Park? A true read into the hearts and minds of a Generation? Jeez.
I'm kind of surprised that you didn't refer to Bush's "non-election" but perhaps you may find it in one of the Mr. Hankie episodes.

#4 — April 28, 2003 @ 02:57AM — Al Barger [URL]

No, I don't think Parker and Stone would even want to be described as voices of a generation. They have a strongly libertarian individualism in their outlook, and wouldn't want to be grabbing the mantle of representing some or other group.

Other than that, yeah, they are a couple of the top comic geniuses of a generation, with lots of great political satire in particular.

#5 — April 28, 2003 @ 03:36AM — Brian Flemming [URL]

Al,

I don't really wish death upon GWB, even hypothetically. I was only mocking your proud heartlessness.

And if you think there is no evidence that GWB has a history of serious substance abuse problems in his "youth" (his description of that time until he was 40 years old), it's only because you don't want to see it.

Bush's substance abuse problems don't mean he's not capable of being a good President. But his alcoholism, at the least, is certainly a fact. And it is far more relevant to evaluating his character and figuring out why he is the way he is than, say, his sex life.

You wrote:

    I would prefer to send MY money to help orphans in Rwanda rather than subisidize drug rehab for some fool Gore voter from Florida. Ha!


Jeb Bush's daughter voted for Gore?

I agree, btw, that Parker and Stone are comic geniuses. It stuns me, though, that a person who writes about killing Iraqis as "rat killing" and speaks offhandedly about cleaning up the gene pool finds them even tolerable.

#6 — April 28, 2003 @ 04:48AM — Al Barger [URL]

Why Brian, the boys of South Park and me are very much on the same wavelength. If anything, I am a little suspicious that I will overvalue their art because I agree so much with their political views.

Are you somehow under the mistaken impression that they are good Hollywood socialist liberals? They are the absolute bane of such people, the toughest rebukers of cheap liberal PC crap going. Just that they cuss and tell some dirty jokes doesn't mean that they're liberals.

Note also that they made a good patriotic tribute with the Loony Tunes inspired episode "Osama Bin Laden Has Farty Pants" that ends with the boys literally waving flags and saying "Go team." And no it clearly was not intended sarcastically.

I'm not accusing you of wishing death on Dubya. I think you need him here to kick around. It's a bit like when Sideshow Bob couldn't bring himself to kill Bart Simpson when he finally got the chance.

As to Dubya's substance abuse, I haven't seen much to suggest that his behavior was all that bad. I will grant that this may be simply because I haven't looked closely. However, that's not because I'm avoiding seeing it. It's that I simply don't much care. I judge him based on his actions as president, not on some investigative report about how much he was drinking 10 or 20 years ago.

Re: "rat killing" You know that I was careful in distinguishing between Iraqi "rats" versus civilians, and the difficulty of how to whack the rats without hitting innocent people. I clearly was not referring to just killing Iraqis, but specifically the regime in power. Thus, please note that it was killing Baathists that I described as "rat killing" and not Iraqis generally.

Finally, good one on the Jeb's daughter thing.

#7 — April 28, 2003 @ 12:47PM — Brian Flemming [URL]

"Blame Canada!"

"Blame France!"

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/4885)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments