Matrix Squabbles?

Written by Phillip Winn
Published April 22, 2003

It is all unconfirmed, so it could simply be the result of delusional ramblings, but the NY Daily News is reporting some last-minute back-office troubles with the Matrix sequels.

Let's start with the ratings. Warner Bros. execs are hoping for a PG-13, but graphic fight sequences caused the MPAA to slap the first sequel, "The Matrix Reloaded," with an R.

"Alan Horn blames the brothers for not budging on the head-kicking scenes," a source tells us. "He also thinks they didn't lobby the MPAA hard enough."

Then there's the release dates. "Reloaded" comes out May 15. The studio wants No. 3, "The Matrix Revolutions" to hit theaters in November or December. The Wachowskis want it released in July, we hear.

"The brothers wanted to give the fans a one-two punch," says our insider. "They figured it would be a year dominated by 'The Matrix' - followed by a triple DVD anthology released at Christmas."

The Wachowskis also are said to be fighting to get a "Revolutions" trailer screened at the end of "Reloaded."

"They want it to follow the credits, which run about nine minutes," says the insider. "The Warners execs say nobody's going to wait nine minutes to see it."

To get their way, the Wachowskis are said to be resorting to a work slowdown.

"The brothers are taking their time putting in all the special effects," says our spy. "They're trying to make the Warner Bros. people sweat" the "Revolutions" deadline.

Of course, Warner is saying this is all garbage, and that the movie is on-track.

Personally, I've found it fascinating that the first Matrix film managed to be so good given the trouble they had getting it done. It is a somewhat simplisitc belief of mine that things that go smoothly tend to have better results than the things you have to work for. The Matrix contradicted that - the exception that proves the rule? The follow-on movies have been an even bigger struggle, with injuries and unexpected deaths and replaced actors and on and on. And yet I find myself watching the trailer for The Matrix: Reloaded daily, wishing it was May 15 already.

PG-13 is not going to happen. July is not going to happen. The trailer for Revolutions? That I can believe. New Line did it with Return of the King, adding the trailer to the end of the credits after The Two Towers had been in theaters for a while, to draw repeat business. Maybe Warner will do something similar.

Phillip Winn is the Chief Geek for BC Magazine, and a blogger since 1995. He may currently be found and followed on Twitter.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Matrix Squabbles?
Published: April 22, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: SF, Video: Action
Writer: Phillip Winn
Phillip Winn's BC Writer page
Phillip Winn's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Phillip Winn
Video: SF
Video: Action
All Video Articles
Phillip Winn's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — April 22, 2003 @ 16:18PM — The Theory

mmm.... i get all excited when i see commercials or the longer theater trailors for Reloaded. Me=cannot wait.

peace.

#2 — April 22, 2003 @ 20:23PM — Andrew Duncalfe [URL]

Hmm... if I'd heard that they had started putting a Return of the King trailer at the end of The Two Towers, I would have gone back one more time to see it again just for that.

#3 — April 24, 2003 @ 19:18PM — John Wilkinson

It's true, the trailer for Revolutions will be showing after Reloaded credits. The latest Premire magazine verified that rumor. I'll be sticking around to see it.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/4774)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments