Who is setting the fires in Baghdad?
Published April 18, 2003
Robert Fisk, reporting from the heart of Baghdad, continues to provide details and analysis largely missing from the rah-rah mainstream media.
In the latest report, he asks some intriguing questions. For example,
- Why, Iraqis are asking, did the United States allow the entire Iraqi cabinet to escape? And they're right. Not just the Beast of Baghdad and his two sons, Qusay and Uday, but the Vice-President, Taha Yassin Ramadan, the Deputy Prime Minister, Tariq Aziz, Saddam's personal adviser, Dr A K Hashimi, the ministers of defence, health, the economy, trade, even Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, the Minister of Information who, long ago, in the days before journalists cosied up to him, was the official who read out the list of executed "brothers" in the purge that followed Saddam's revolution - relatives of prisoners would dose themselves on valium before each Sahaf appearance.
Here's what Baghdadis are noticing - and what Iraqis are noticing in all the main cities of the country. Take the vast security apparatus with which Saddam surrounded himself, the torture chambers and the huge bureaucracy that was its foundation. President Bush promised that America was campaigning for human rights in Iraq, that the guilty, the war criminals, would be brought to trial. The 60 secret police headquarters in Baghdad are empty, even the three-square-mile compound headquarters of the Iraqi Intelligence Service.
I have been to many of them. But there is no evidence even that a single British or US forensic officer has visited the sites to sift the wealth of documents lying there or talk to the ex-prisoners returning to their former places of torment. Is this idleness. Or is this wilful?
If Fisk's observations are accurate, it is puzzling. But I suppose it would be in line with the Bush Administration's general attitude toward global justice. Bush is opposed to the International Criminal Court, so perhaps his Administration simply plans to hold its own secret "trials" of those it determines are enemies. If this is the case, evidence would hardly be needed.
Fisk asks another question: Who is working with the Marines? The same police who tortured and oppressed the Iraqi people?
- Take the Qasimiyeh security station beside the river Tigris. It's a pleasant villa - once owned by an Iranian-born Iraqi who was deported to Iran in the 1980s. There's a little lawn and a shrubbery and at first you don't notice the three big hooks in the ceiling of each room or the fact that big sheets of red paper, decorated with footballers, have been pasted over the windows to conceal the rooms from outsiders. But across the floors, in the garden, on the roof, are the files of this place of suffering. They show, for example, that the head of the torture centre was Hashem al-Tikrit, that his deputy was called Rashid al-Nababy.
Mohammed Aish Jassem, an ex-prisoner, showed me how he was suspended from the ceiling by Captain Amar al-Isawi, who believed Jassem was a member of the religious Dawa party. "They put my hands behind my back like this and tied them and then pulled me into the air by my tied wrists," he told me. "They used a little generator to lift me up, right up to the ceiling, then they'd release the rope in the hope of breaking my shoulder when I fell."
- Who is setting the fires in Baghdad?
- Published: April 18, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Culture: Media
- Writer: Brian Flemming
- Brian Flemming's BC Writer page
- Brian Flemming's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I think concern for the Iraqis has always been a big part of us "left-wingers'" argument against this war.
U.S. OUT OF IRAQ!
US out of iraq, huh? if you care so much about them why would you want us to abandon them to certain misfortune? do you think it wouldn't be disastrous to just leave now? some new dictator would just take over (if not saddam himself) and the country would be back where it was.






wow, you really care about the poor suffering iraqi's...now that it fits with your anti-bush agenda. before, when it wasn't against bush to give a shit about the iraqi's, left-wingers just said "fuck 'em."