<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Movies for Nature Lovers and Footballers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 23:03:35 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by foad on Movies for Nature Lovers and Footballers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/13/233641.php#comment-37476</link>
<description>i ned to somthings sex movies for free</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37476@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 23:03:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Steve Rhodes on Movies for Nature Lovers and Footballers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/13/233641.php#comment-7725</link>
<description>
 Both are really good movies.  

People can see where &lt;a href=http://www.roxie.com/rivrevs.html&gt;Rivers &amp; Tides&lt;/a&gt; is &lt;a href=http://www.roxie.com/Riversdate.html&gt;playing&lt;/a&gt;.  It really should be seen in a theater.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">7725@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:57:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>