Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets

Written by Kriselda Jarnsaxa
Published April 12, 2003
page 1 | 2

And, of course, there's Dobby, the House Elf, a CGI creation that some have, curiously, compared to Gollum from The Two Towers. While they are both CGI creatures interacting with the cast on a greater level than most CGI creatures have in the past, there is little to base a comparison on aside from that. Dobby's role, while important, doesn't place him on screen that much, and as a character, he doesn't have nearly the depth (or the need for it) that Gollum has. Still, Dobby is a fun character, and convincingly done.

The Quidditch game in this film is almost better than that in "Sorcerer's Stone" - it's faster, furiously-played, and even more dangerous this time around, and, of course, there's a return trip to Diagon Alley as well.

One of the strengths of the Harry Potter series is that the entire story arc has already been planned out, so you don't end up with the improbable coincidences that mark so many other movie sequels, stretching the story a bit too thin and leading to the general decline in quality the longer a series goes on. There are places where you can already see things being built on from the first movie, and hints dropped at what we may see as the series progresses. It really helps give a sense of "reality" (though obviously an altered one) to the world in which the Harry Potter stories take place, and that's a nice change of pace.

The DVD set itself is very nice. The movie transfer looks very good, and the sound is effective even on your basic "built into the TV" sound system. The best part, though, is, of course, the extras. There's a great interview with JK Rowling and the scriptwriter for the movies, that shows just how involved she is with the film series, and the kind of attention being paid to staying true to the books. Also included is an interactive tour of Dumbledore's office, letting you get a closer look at many of the objects lying around. It also has a short behind-the-scenes feature that not only looks at how the office itself was created, but also looks at some of the other sets, props and costumes as well.

My favourite part, though, is the interviews with the students, professors and "more" (adults who aren't teachers at the school). It gives you a few glimpses into the actors away from their characters, and what they've brought to the characters. I did, though, feel a twinge of sadness at seeing the brief bit featuring Richard Harris, because it brought home again that he won't be in any of the future films - and it's hard to see how anyone could replace him.

All in all, I highly recommend this fil, and the rest of the DVD package as well. I've now had it just barely over 24 hours, and am getting ready to watch it for a third time. It's that enjoyable.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Published: April 12, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Adventure, Video: Family, Video: Fantasy
Writer: Kriselda Jarnsaxa
Kriselda Jarnsaxa's BC Writer page
Kriselda Jarnsaxa's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Kriselda Jarnsaxa
Video: Adventure
Video: Family
Video: Fantasy
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — April 12, 2003 @ 18:45PM — The Theory

yeah, i have not read the books... and i have not seen the movie... and i do not plan on doing so. hehe.

peace.

#2 — April 12, 2003 @ 19:10PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

Oh, all of you, really, you've got to read the books, since they are much better and textured than the movies. Plus there are four (soon to be five books) and they have a consistent arc, characters and style. There is a reason they have become instant classics akin to Lord of the Rings or the Madelaine L'Engle books.

I've rented Chamber of Secrets for viewing tonight, but I am sure the book is better. And it's the Philospher's Stone.

#3 — April 12, 2003 @ 19:27PM — Kriselda Jarnsaxa [URL]

In most of the world, it's "Philosopher's Stone", but in the US, for some ungodly reason, it's "Sorcerer's Stone". We have to make everything difficult :)

#4 — April 12, 2003 @ 20:53PM — The Theory

it's cuz Philosopher is too darn hard to spell. haha.

peace.

#5 — April 12, 2003 @ 21:33PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

No, it's because Philosopher is too hard to understand.

You made Dobby cry.

#6 — April 13, 2003 @ 12:00PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

I saw "Chamber of Secrets" last night and enjoyed it (but then, almost anything with Robbie Coltrane is enjoyable). However, J.K. Rowlings has painted the filmakers into a corner with the inflation of the Harry Potter books. CoS was 161 minutes.

Here is the page count for the books (Raincoast editions):
Philosopher's Stone: 223 pages
Chamber of Secrets: 251 pages
Prisoner of Azkaban: 317 pages
Goblet of Fire: 636 pages
Order of the Phoenix: 768 pages

Considering the rule of thumb that 1 script page is 1 minute of screen time, the Harry Potter movies have a problem stuffing the books into a reasonable screening time.

#7 — April 13, 2003 @ 15:48PM — Dew

Actually OotP is 896 and Goblet of Fire is 734, maybe thats just for the American Versions...

#8 — April 13, 2003 @ 17:10PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

I got the page count for OotP from Amazon.ca, and as I said, the page counts were for the Canadian editions. Perhaps Scholastic prints in a larger type for you Yanks. After all if they change the book titles, who knows what dark arts they might be up to?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/4568)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments