<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on More on RIAA Suits</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:13:37 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Jim S</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/04/130126.php#comment-6945</link>
<description>&quot;it is not wise to really piss off computer science students, who now more than ever will be spurred to create untraceable sharing systems&quot;

In my honest opinion, the only way they could have encouraged that particular course of action any more is to go after a student at MIT. They DID hit Rensselaer, which WILL bite them in the ass.

Wasn&#039;t it MIT, Rensselaer and another school who originally worked on that newfangled internet thingie??? 

anyway, don&#039;t fuck with the techie-geeks... they WILL find a way to electronically screw you!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6945@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Apr 2003 17:13:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by BJ</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/04/04/130126.php#comment-6934</link>
<description>Well done. If the RIAA had convened a secret meeting three years ago to plan how to alienate their best customers and delay the industry&#039;s entry to the 21st Century, they could hardly have put together a better plan than the one they&#039;ve been carrying out unintentionally.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6934@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Apr 2003 13:28:35 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>