Is Bush working for bin Laden?

Written by Brian Flemming
Published April 03, 2003

Is President George W. Bush secretly an agent working for Osama bin Laden?

There is no direct evidence of this. There isn't even, to my knowledge, any professionally faked evidence--no aluminum tubes, Niger connections or model-airplane WMDs.

I admit, I don't have as much to work with in proving this hypothesis as Bush, Powell and Rumsfeld had in "proving" theirs.

However, just as the Pentagon (wisely) "games out" the unthinkable as a mind-stretching exercise, it's worth exploring this fantasy Bush/Osama-alliance premise to see what the process yields.

The game: You are President Bush. You are secretly allied with Osama bin Laden, and his goals are your goals. Your immediate aim for your first term in office is this: Secretly help Osama bin Laden as much as you can, while still retaining the support of the Amercan people.

It's a tough task--you need to help the world's leading terrorist, but at the same time, you need to make it look like all that help you are giving him comes from "good intentions." You need to make it to at least Nov 2004 before anyone catches on.

I would suggest that, inevitably, in order to secretly help Osama while still maintaining U.S popular support, you would do the following:

1. START A HOLY WAR, BUT DON'T CALL IT THAT. One of the highest priorities of your boss Osama is to start a holy war that spans the globe. The trick for you, Mr. President, is to start a war that is perceived in the Muslim world as a Christian war on Islam, but not to make too many people in the U.S. think of it that way. So pay some lip service to Islam as a "religion of peace," but fire up that Christian rhetoric, too. Become the most fundamentalist-Christian-sounding President in decades. Say words like "crusade" (oops! I made a "mistake"). Mention God a lot. Term this conflict as a fight between "good" and "evil"--the Muslims of the world will have no problem determining what camp you put them in. For Allah's sake, don't tone down the religious rhetoric. Crank it up to 11. The result will be an inflamed Muslim world and a rah-rah response at home.

2. MAKE THE UNITED STATES LESS FREE. Intimidate the media into supporting your war. Reduce civil rights at home. A nervous nation is an easy-to-manipulate nation. Oh, and be sure to hold any Arab you wish in jail for as long as you wish--Osama loves it when the Muslim world hears that the U.S. is doing exactly those things for which it condemns Arab leaders. It gives him iron-clad evidence of hypocrisy and strips the United States of the moral high ground--historically, one of its most valuable assets in world opinion. Torture would help, too--have your intelligence and military people leak information about specific torture methods the U.S. is using. This will help the right wing of your party feel you are being "tough" while outraging Osama's soldiers (and converting non-soldiers). Secret trials and executions would also help--brag about them. In other words...

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Is Bush working for bin Laden?
Published: April 03, 2003
Type:
Section: Culture
Writer: Brian Flemming
Brian Flemming's BC Writer page
Brian Flemming's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Brian Flemming
All Culture Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — April 3, 2003 @ 22:13PM — Craig Diehls

This exact point needs to be made over and over. In the end this all will look so obvious. Such is the difference between hindsight and foresight.

#2 — April 5, 2003 @ 12:54PM — InMarin

Brian, I assume you are aware of Greg Palast's investigations into the Bush/bin Laden connections:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/events/newsnight/1645527.stm

GREG PALAST:
The CIA and Saudi Arabia, the Bushes and the Bin Ladens. Did their connections cause America to turn a blind eye to terrorism?

#3 — April 5, 2003 @ 14:11PM — sean

really funny. you know what's even funnier? if bush illegally gave weapons to iraq for oil, then tried to cover it up by announcing that he definitly would veto any resolution in the UN that had any possiblity of ending saddams regime, (which would cause him to lose his oil scheme and reveal his illegal actions) thereby making the UN a joke and completely useless. then, blackmail turkey with the idea that they won't get into the european union if they allow troops in their country, causing the deaths of many men and women because of poor positioning. and then offer to sneak saddam out of the country, while demanding to be in on the rebuilding of iraq so he could get a piece of the oil and hopefully do damage control. then it would sure be clear who's side bush was on. wait, this sounds familiar... oh yeah, france already did all that.

#4 — April 6, 2003 @ 01:20AM — Brian Flemming [URL]

sean,

Damn relativism. I hate that. It lacks moral clarity.

Anyway, let's say France did do all that. What should happen now? Should they apologize? Some kind of a punishment?

#5 — April 6, 2003 @ 12:57PM — Brian Flemming [URL]

InMarin,

No. I didn't know about that one. Thanks.

I'm looking forward to Michael Moore's next film, which will also be partly about the Bush-bin Laden connection. I like Michael Moore's fair, balanced approach. It reminds me of Fox, in a way. He reports, I decide.

Truthfully, I don't know if anything will come of his family's known ties to the bin Laden family. But I do wonder why particular FBI investigations were halted. Maybe this has something to do with Bush's opposition to an independent inquiry into 9-11.

#6 — February 19, 2004 @ 16:02PM — Yo mama

That is bullshit and you can lick my pussy.

#7 — February 19, 2004 @ 16:11PM — Chris Kent

A nice plethoria of orifices covered there in one single sentence. Nice job!

#8 — February 19, 2004 @ 16:13PM — anonymous

OHHHHHHH,I get it. Another one of those
lesbian trapped in a mans body jokes...

#9 — March 31, 2004 @ 12:19PM — T

This would certainly go with Nostradamus's third anti-christ named "MABUS" (osaMA BUSh)

#10 — September 14, 2006 @ 12:46PM — Floyd Blue

I have suspected this connection between them for some time, I am inclined to believe that the two words osaMABUSh is what Nostradamus wrote about. I can no way prove this connection yet my intuition tells me this is true, I learned a long time ago to trust my intuition.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/4333)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments