<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on FREEZE! Hands in the air!</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:15:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Victor Plenty</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/28/123857.php#comment-230541</link>
<description>Many people think they flush and wash their hands, although they really don&#039;t. Not effectively, anyway.

Often it&#039;s necessary to flush more than once, particularly if your business involved leaving behind anything solid. In such cases the first flush leaves far too much behind, turning that toilet into a big smelly &lt;b&gt;poo&lt;/b&gt;pourri.

Washing the hands is a place where once is never enough. In fact far too many people just run plain water over their hands for three to five seconds and think that makes them clean. No, no, no.

Use soap. You might get clean without soap but it takes much longer. Lather up and scrub thoroughly, taking at least 20 to 30 seconds. Then rinse off all that soap, lather up again, and scrub again for another 20 to 30 seconds.

This double hand wash is the minimum any competent county health department tells food service workers to do after using the bathroom. If you do this, you have some rational reason to think your hands might be clean.

Just don&#039;t use your newly cleaned fingertips to open the restroom door. Save your paper towel for that.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">230541@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:15:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim McCullough</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/28/123857.php#comment-230503</link>
<description>Hello from Sebastopol, California, USA

I was surfing the web for toilet etiquette articles and I saw your site and thought you might enjoy what I&#039;ve written here.

Many places do not have unisex toilets but you all probably have the same problems at home as everyone else with toilet seats being left up by the men.

For as long as I can remember I have always put the seat of the toilet down and not only that but lowered the lid too.

It didn&#039;t occur to me until late in life that others of the male persuasion would almost uniformly leave the seat up after using the facilities..... just in case they were going to return, soon, I guess.

Women I&#039;ve known have taken great exception to the seat being in an up position. particularly late at night which prompted this limerick given to me early in 2003 (written by a man) I suppose.

Her feet flew into the air
Her face turned crimson red
She felt both cold and wet
And wished that she were dead
Now the moral of the story is:
Never sit down abrupt-
Always look behind you
For the seat may still be up

Anon

My answer to this is this:

Seat up  - seat down
An argument to cause a frown
Lid down brings fortune good
Fair for all its understood

JWM 2003

I&#039;ve since added to this by pointing to good feng shui and the increased good fortune,pleasantness and good humor that abounds by this simple courtesy.

I now make small tent style paper signs for the bathroom to convince people to lower the lid on the toilet for (good feng shui) which appeals more often than not to the feminine gender ......(with the lid down so is the seat), but men also like some of the limericks I offer.

I also make some for the institutional lidless variety......a little more pointed in phrase; these adhere to the wall with double-stick poster tape.

On a recent vacation around the U.S. I handed-out many samples just for fun.

If you are interested and want a few samples........GoTo:

htttp://www.sonic.net/~ronnie/lids.html

Jim


PS let me know if you want sample e-mailed or .................snail-mailed</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">230503@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2005 02:11:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/28/123857.php#comment-6391</link>
<description>This reminds me of the bit in the biography of Howard Hughes, where he, and Swifty Lazar, both germophobes, were trapped in a public washroom because neither of them were willing to touch the door handle. They were rescued by Frank Sinatra, I think (not a fact because I don&#039;t have the book at hand), but that is what I recall.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6391@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:09:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/28/123857.php#comment-6357</link>
<description>G, you are the bold voice of reason. Thanks!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6357@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:36:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The Theory</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/28/123857.php#comment-6353</link>
<description>eh, why settle for &quot;FREEZE! Hands in the air!&quot; when you can just put a bullet in their head and be done with it?

peace.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6353@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 12:55:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>