<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Radiohead uses new album to launch anti-Bush attack</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:56:17 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Andy</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6387</link>
<description>If you think the whole election thing was proven to be false, I&#039;d suggest you read the first chapter of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0452283914/qid=1048892058/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/103-8772513-6916613?v=glance&amp;s=books&amp;n=507846&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt; book and you&#039;ll discover why it hasn&#039;t been proven or forgotten about.

Anyway, I&#039;m sure this album is gonna be back to Radioheads roots and be more guitar based</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6387@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2003 17:56:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Woland</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6245</link>
<description>Radiohead owns you.

*points at you*

Yes, you. Owns you.

And I suspect the new title refers more to a rising global suspicion, rather than any one particular incident or period. Sort of like how &quot;Happy as a clam&quot; is not in reference to any one point in time, but the overall emotional state of clams.

Amnesiac was a little weak, Kid A and OK Computer were unparalled classics. I suspect this album will only enforce further ownage.

*points*</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6245@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:38:41 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6150</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;Ad hominem assault on Jim: you misspelled &quot;defense&quot;. &lt;/I&gt;

Don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about sweetie, &quot;over &#039;dere, it&#039;s d&#039; fence&quot; as we say in the outports, pointing at a neighbour&#039;s landscape improvement.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6150@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 18:19:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by san</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6147</link>
<description>Ad hominem assault on Jim:  you misspelled &quot;defense&quot;.  Oops!  I forgot that it&#039;s my entire country that misspells a rather significant portion of the English language.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6147@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 18:01:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6140</link>
<description>because of course the first defence a bot makes is &quot;i&#039;m not a &#039;bot&quot;

And then they use a soundtrack by Radiohead, who, of course, are bots.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6140@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:09:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by san</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6136</link>
<description>A &#039;bot running the &quot;Jane, you ignorant slut&quot; script with the &quot;Simple Latin Phrases&quot; module 1.0.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6136@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:49:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Mark Saleski</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6127</link>
<description>OK Computer: i never understood what all the fuss was about. over and over again i&#039;d read reviews saying that this was one of the best, most important rock records of all time.

it sounds like low-rent King Crimson to me.

i actually kinda like the &quot;self-indulgent rubbish&quot; like KidA and Amnesiac better...maybe &#039;cause they don&#039;t sound like OK Computer.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6127@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:32:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6125</link>
<description>Yep, a &#039;bot, running the &quot;Jane, you ignorant slut&quot; script, I think.

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6125@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:31:08 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6124</link>
<description>I preferred Anathema&#039;s previous album, &quot;Judgement&quot; to &quot;A Nice Day to Exit&quot;.  ANDtE sounds just a bit too much like Radiohead for it&#039;s own good.

Perhaps Radiohead&#039;s &quot;Kid A&quot; and &quot;Amnesiac&quot; are their equivalents of King Crimson&#039;s equally unlistenable early 70s albums &quot;Lizard&quot; and &quot;Islands&quot;.  Perhaps we&#039;ll get their &quot;Larks Tongues in Aspic&quot; next?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6124@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:30:28 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Marty</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6118</link>
<description>Jim, you don&#039;t like my opinions or posts so you resort to ad hominem attacks. Nice... 

I am not a bot and I actually like the first few Radiohead albums. &#039;Creep&quot;, for instance, is a damn good song. I agree with Tim that Kid A was lame.

If you want the Radiohead album that never was get your hands on Anathema&#039;s latest. A stunning CD that gets better with every listen. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6118@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 16:16:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Jim Carruthers</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6114</link>
<description>I think Marty is actually a &#039;bot since his syntax couldn&#039;t pass the Turing test.

And on music, agreed that the last Radiohead album was somewhat substandard (a buncha pages of wank for a booklet wtf? This is the rationale for not downloading via p2p? What were you thinking?)

As for a future release, Radiohead, please prove me wrong in thinking it will be an unlistenable mess.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6114@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:56:36 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tim Hall</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6107</link>
<description>B*gg*r the politics; you can never hear the lyrics the way Thom Yorke slurs his voice anyway.  What&#039;s the music going to be like?  Will it be as good as &quot;OK Computer&quot;, or tuneless self indulgent rubbish like &quot;Kid A&quot;?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6107@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:33:47 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The Theory</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6078</link>
<description>mmm... radiohead.

peace.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6078@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 14:19:00 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Nigel Richardson</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/26/132651.php#comment-6073</link>
<description>Since when has the title of a Radiohead album been the criteria on which &quot;the best the anti-war/Bush left can manage&quot; is judged? That would insulting if it wasn&#039;t so silly. Might as well say the title of the last Celine Dion album -- whatever that was -- shows the moral bankrupcy of the right. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6073@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 13:55:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>