<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:29:04 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-6269</link>
<description>sorry Lynne</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6269@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:29:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Lynne on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-6268</link>
<description>I was startled by your reference to Peter O&#039;Toole as an &quot;aristocratic Englishman&quot;. He does play that part well, and probably would have been knighted by now - except that he is Irish.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6268@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:25:29 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Peter Petrisko on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-5782</link>
<description>On MICHAEL MOORE:

The BAD news -

Moore makes a complete ass of himself (again), thus proving the old adage:

&quot;Booze &amp; Glitz just don&#039;t mix.&quot; 

It wasn&#039;t just an acceptance speech, it was a Public Service Announcement.

The GOOD news -

Since it appeared on television, Moore is now eligible to be nominated in the &quot;Best Performance by an Angry White Man in a Musical or Variety Show&quot; category at next year&#039;s Emmy Awards.

Personally, I think his chances of winning that Emmy are pretty darn good.

Pete</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5782@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 03:32:18 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Steve Rhodes on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-5732</link>
<description>
 Ryan, Moore said he and the others make non-fiction films (his one feature film Canadian Bacon was pretty bad).

</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5732@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:11:40 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-5726</link>
<description>I have seen the damage a kilt can do firsthand.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5726@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:59:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by The Theory on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-5715</link>
<description>yeah... give me a kilt any day.

*The Theory... would totally wear a kilt*

peace.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5715@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:17:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by James Russell on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-5705</link>
<description>Goddamn, Eric, first it was fattism and greasism, now it&#039;s kiltism. What is your problem with men in kilts? And what will you be opposed to next? :)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5705@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:52:43 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Eric Olsen on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-5671</link>
<description>Thanks Bill, you rock</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5671@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:46:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Bill Sherman on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-5669</link>
<description>Eric, for the record, I liked this take on the show and on Moore&#039;s blustery comments. . .</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5669@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:42:31 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ryan on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-5668</link>
<description>Im Sorry What?
Some random guy who should spend his spare time in the gym instead of in the editing suite, is trying to tell the US Population what he thinks. And then he washes away his crying words with a bit of hipocracy..... Im sorry did you say you like making movies about fiction because we&#039;re living in a fictitious world...my ass Moore! The world we live in now is more non-fiction and real than I have ever seen it. Cancer, War, AIDS, Sept. 11... all these things are real, so take light Mr. Moore.. Untill anyone has the balls to take a seat in Mr. Bush&#039;s chair, please dont tell us what you would do if you were in it. </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5668@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:37:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by san on Oscars: Peace Si, Moore No</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/24/081230.php#comment-5615</link>
<description>But that&#039;s Moore&#039;s style.  It has been since Roger &amp; Me.  And I respect his unwillingness to subvert his style, private forum or no.

Adrien Brody&#039;s brand of peace protest was, however, much more to my personal taste.

I understand where you&#039;re coming from in labeling Moore &quot;fat and greasy&quot;.  It&#039;s an emotional response.  But I think that in a public forum, it weakens your case.  (It might be appropriate with some humor, but I don&#039;t think that you had much of a sense of humor about it last night.)  If in an anti-war plea I refer to President Bush as President Bush, then I may get some people to listen.  If I call him that arrogant, idiotic, Nazi bastard, I&#039;m losing my audience before I can even state my case.

Tell me you meant &quot;fat and greasy&quot; with a sarcastic sense of humor, and then I&#039;ll buy it.  Otherwise, you can call him whatever you want, but I think it weakens everything you say after that.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5615@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2003 11:27:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>