On a Dark Day

Written by Eric Olsen
Published March 23, 2003
page 1 | 2

Americans fight and die in Iraq today not for empire, not for oil, not for a
religion, not to shock and awe the world with our astonishing power. They
fight for love — for love of freedom, our own and all humanity's. When the
guns are silent, their political leaders must take every care to advance the
aspirations that have given their sacrifice its nobility, and our country
its real glory.

How do real Iraqis feel about all this? David Ignatius is there:

    There were moving scenes of grateful Iraqis waving to the American troops who had come to liberate them from Saddam Hussein. A farmer named Haider told me the American invasion was "the best celebration" he'd had since the Baath Party seized control of Iraq more than three decades ago. Two of Haider's brothers have been executed for alleged crimes against the regime, he said.

    "It's a criminal regime, and they execute everyone, for one word, even," said a 14-year-old boy named Mohammed, who said one of his brothers had been executed. Asked what kind of government he wanted to see in the future, a jubilant farmer named Salem Muhsen answered: "Anything but Saddam's terrorism." Two of his cousins had been executed, he said, for the crime of traveling to Kuwait to sell their vegetables. [Washington Post]

Yet invasion and bombardment and civilian casualties also cause resentment:
    Some analysts had expected Basra to be a cakewalk for the coalition, because its largely Shiite population dislikes Hussein. Basra will doubtless fall soon, but probably not in the act of anti-Hussein insurgency some American planners may have expected. The danger is that it will feel like a defeated city, rather than
    a liberated one.

    Will the snags in the south be repeated on a larger and more dangerous scale in the decisive battle for Baghdad? Will America's attempts to destroy Iraqi resolve instead stiffen it, as so often happens in war? America's military challenge, in the remaining days or weeks of battle, will be to avoid turning popular hatred of Hussein into anger against the "shock and awe" military colossus that has come to topple him.

That's why the political is as important as the military in this campaign.

page 1 | 2
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
On a Dark Day
Published: March 23, 2003
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
All Politics Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 23, 2003 @ 15:15PM — san [URL]

The site of any dead or wounded is horrible, I'll grant you that. And going so far as to show photographs of dead American soldiers is inexcusable. I believe it's the Geneva Convention that prevents those engaged in a war from identifying POWs or the dead by name or photograph. Iraq is clearly violating that rule. However, I remind you that American television networks are regularly broadcasting and repeating footage of Iraqi POWs as they are captured. Both sides are cheating.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/4017)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments