<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics: Comments on Dixie Chicks defenders need to learn some manners</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 22:23:25 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by tough patooties</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/23/031241.php#comment-5969</link>
<description>sorry about the multiple posts.  it&#039;s this dagnabbit computer!  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5969@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2003 22:23:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Foghorn Leghorn</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/23/031241.php#comment-5495</link>
<description>And there we have just one of the thousands of fine examples of the superior manners and intellect of the Dixie Bashers, right? Or are comments like &quot;GO TO FRANCE CHICKS!&quot;  part of a &quot;substantive argument about the real serious problem of Islamic radical terror and how we are to defend ourselves&quot;?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5495@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2003 22:48:27 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by mac</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/23/031241.php#comment-5431</link>
<description>I believe the Dixie Chicks forgot their roots and who purchases their music(Rednecks)? Maybe they should go to France where their views which seem to be the same. I disagree with them going to entertain the troops. Who would want a group that does not support the Commander and Chief &quot;entertaining&quot; the Brave American&#039;s!! I will never own another Dixie Chick cd and will boycott all companies that they endorse. GO TO FRANCE CHICKS!!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5431@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2003 16:24:05 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Al Barger</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/23/031241.php#comment-5428</link>
<description>No, I think Bono&#039;s fine.  He has also reached out even to Jesse Helms, perhaps the mostly widely reviled Republican of a generation.  Now obviously Bono likes himself pretty well, but he just doesn&#039;t assume some air of smug moral superiority to anyone who disagrees with him.

Also, if he expresses a political opinion, he&#039;s generally got something better and more relevant to say about it than personal insults aimed at those who disagree.

In short, Bono is a thoughtful and honorable person who may display honest differences of opinion from what I would make of a situation.  OK, I can work with that.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5428@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2003 16:01:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by san</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/23/031241.php#comment-5392</link>
<description>-&quot;You write &#039;Born to Kill&#039; on your helmet and you wear a peace button. What&#039;s that supposed to be, some kind of sick joke?!&quot;
-&quot;I think I was trying to suggest something about the duality of man, sir.&quot;

Al Barger, representative of the bizarre duality of the pro-war movement:  free speech only if it&#039;s pro-war speech.

-&quot;We&#039;ve gotta keep our heads until this peace craze blows over.&quot;
-&quot;Aye-aye, sir.&quot;

[Many thanks to the combined talents of  Stanley Kubrick, Michael Herr and Gustav Hasford.]</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5392@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2003 11:00:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Drew</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/23/031241.php#comment-5356</link>
<description>You give Bono more credit than he deserves.
Patisan considerations dominate here.  Blair is from  Labour and Bush is Republican.  I&#039;m sure Blair has many other policies that Bono agrees with, while none of Bush&#039;s policies hold any appeal for an Austin liberal like Ms. Maines.  Mr. Blair is sincere in his belief that war is necessary because he is from Labour, the &quot;moral&quot;party.  Mr. Bush is a vile specimen of the right who has no morality in the eyes of these people.  These people are the anointed, and we should listen to them.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5356@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:08:20 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Brian Flemming</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2003/03/23/031241.php#comment-5355</link>
<description>Hey folks!

Watch the dueling Al Bargers!

&quot;Are we supposed to take you all seriously? You sling irrelevant ad hominems and bigotry...&quot;

VERSUS

&quot;&#039;Ashamed&#039; of the president? &lt;b&gt;Shut your pie-hole.&lt;/b&gt; Who do you think you are?&quot;

Who&#039;s the real Al Barger? The one who doesn&#039;t likes good manners or the one who doesn&#039;t?

I don&#039;t know.

But on behalf of every single person in America, I&#039;d like to say that we&#039;re all ashamed of both Al Bargers.

(I am now officially convinced that &quot;Al Barger&quot; is a fictional character along the lines of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weeklyworldnews.com/features/anger.cfm&quot;&gt;Ed Anger&lt;/a&gt; at the Weekly World News. Hey, wait a second...&quot;Al Barger,&quot; &quot;Ed Anger.&quot; They even sound the same. Well, anyway, whoever made him up, nice job. I will still address him as if he&#039;s real, except in parentheses.)</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5355@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2003 08:06:25 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>