Timely viewing: David O. Russell's "Three Kings"

Written by Kate Sherrod
Published March 20, 2003

I don't have cable TV, which in rural Wyoming means I don't get any TV, period. So on the evening of September 11, 2001, while most of the world was probably still watching CNN or whatever, I went home from work and popped a copy of "Three Kings" into the VCR. It seemed the proper thing to do since it was immediately obvious that we'd be going to war in that part of the world again very, very soon and I felt the need to meditate on what, really that meant (my other alternative being, say, reading about Alexander the Great's tour of Afghanistan a really long time ago. Maybe not so very relevant, that?).

Tonight I plan to do so again.

First of all, "Three Kings" is an incredibly entertaining film. David O. Russell managed to make what I can only describe as the "Reservoir Dogs" of war movies, managing to make even the journey of a bullet through a man's gut and the resulting sepsis close to hilarious. There is ample comic relief in the persons of reservists Conrad Viig and "Bolo." Etc.

Second and more important, though, is the treatment it gives to the issue of finishing what is started. While the main plot - a small and misfit band of reservists and one career officer concoct a plan to steal millions in Kuwaiti bullion away from one of Saddam Hussein's bunkers - is gripping enough, what really haunts the viewer for days if not months afterwards is the subplot in which members of the poorly-supported Iraqi underground find themselves depending utterly on these would-be thieves to get them across the border to Iran. George Bush I told the people to rise up against Saddam and they would be supported. They weren't. And many of them died in the aftermath.

The film is fiction, but the predicament of some of those brave, ordinary citizens was not, and is not. Think of that as you laugh and wince, and think of how much worse off those people have been under sanctions, oil for food deals, and other nonsense we kidded ourselves into believing were a better way to deal with Saddam than war.

We should have finished what we started 12 years ago, but better late than never.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Timely viewing: David O. Russell's "Three Kings"
Published: March 20, 2003
Type:
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Action, Video: Drama, Video: Military
Writer: Kate Sherrod
Kate Sherrod's BC Writer page
Kate Sherrod's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Kate Sherrod
Video: Action
Video: Drama
Video: Military
All Video Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 20, 2003 @ 16:15PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

Bullion, you mean like those little cubes you put in soup?

#2 — March 20, 2003 @ 16:20PM — Eric Olsen

Excellent review, analysis and perspective. Finish what you start, especially this time or we will have the credibility of the French, and deserve it.

By the way, do you know Dick Cheney?

#3 — March 20, 2003 @ 16:24PM — Kate Sherrod [URL]

Actually, I do know Dick Cheney. My dad was his state trooper escort back when Cheney was Wyoming's Congressman... and back when I was in high school (ca. 1986) and my dad was running for sheriff, Cheney was at the same rally and I cornered the poor guy for like a half hour about women in the military.

Scary thing is, he still remembers this.

#4 — March 20, 2003 @ 16:58PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

I can't believe you didn't use the line "you don't know Dick".

c'mon it's a gimme.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/3971)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments