Academy Awards angst
Published March 20, 2003
I'm not always in agreement with some of Eric Olsen's sentiments, but I am undeniably in agreement with something he says here: "God, please spare me the tone of self-congratulatory concern". This comes in relation to Nicole Kidman wondering whether or not she should attend the Oscars ceremony when there was a war on.
I linked to this CNN article at my blog the other day. In it is this scene of Daniel Day-Lewis wondering what to do:
It was unclear whether Hollywood starsmany of whom have campaigned fervently against any warstill planned to attend Sunday's ceremony if military action was underway.
Daniel Day-Lewisconsidered a front-runner for the best actor Oscar for his role in "Gangs of New York"told reporters last week it would "seem obscene if we're seen bouncing up the red carpet grinning when people are dying. It's going to be very difficult to find a way to do this."
Oddly enough, Daniel, people were dying in Spain and China in the 1930s, they were dying in Europe and Southeast Asia in the 1940s, they were dying in Korea in the 1950s, they were dying in Vietnam in the 1960s, they were dying in Cambodia in the 1970s, they were dying in the Middle East in the 1980s, they were dying in the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, and I'm pretty sure they were dying in Afghanistan as recently as last year. I wonder people displayed quite so much angst (especially in public) back then about whether the movie industry's night of nights should go on when those things were happening.
So yes, I'm pretty much with Eric here when it comes to being tired of the "self-congratulatory concern"; indeed, I'm pretty much over all the talk about whether or not it's appropriate for the Oscars to be going ahead in these troubled times. Especially since troubled times have never stopped it in the past. They may have called off the Olympics in WW2, but they never called off the Academy Awards...
- Academy Awards angst
- Published: March 20, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: News
- Writer: James Russell
- James Russell's BC Writer page
- James Russell's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
James, what do you mean you aren't always in agreement with my sentiments? I thought the force of my logic battered all dissent into acquiescence.
At least Daniel Day-Lewis has had the decency to keep his specific opinions about the war to himself.
James W., why do you applaud Day-Lewis's "decency" to keep his specific opinions about the war to himself, when you broadcast your specific opinions loud and clear? Are you indecent?
There is a time and place for everything, and forcing your political opinion on a nonpolitical forum is rude and inappropriate.
The Oscars haven't happened yet. But still we speak of Day-Lewis as "decent" for not expressing an opinion in any forum. In other words, not expressing an anti-war opinion. If somebody says "God bless America" on television, on the radio, or at the Oscars, isn't that, by your own logic, inappropriate?
I figure people die of starvation and disease every day and nobody really makes notice of that, so why not just keep on partying now? Enjoy your life while you can and if you get to help others along the way then wonderful.




My conspiracy theory: the pro-war movement is not concerned with a matter of respect in a time of war, but rather with giving a lot of people in the anti-war movement national air time to promote peace during their acceptance speeches.