Making it up for Ireland?
Published March 17, 2003
The professor of Irish History at Oxford's St Patrick's Day op-ed for the New York Times was well timed to co-incide with the publication of his latest book, which shows a degree of marketing nous if nothing else.
Richard Eder reviews Roy Foster's latest contribution to the revision of the tangled mass that passes for history in Ireland. Eder highlights the literary focus of Foster's work which suggests the conflation of story and history is a peculiarly Irish trait:
''The elision of the personal and the national, the way history becomes a kind of scaled-up biography, and biography a microcosmic history, is a particularly Irish phenomenon,'' he writes. And, noting the 19th-century novel's contribution to a national sense in some countries, he points out that Ireland lacks any such formative exemplar: ''History — or historiography — is our true novel.''
- Making it up for Ireland?
- Published: March 17, 2003
- Type:
- Section: Books
- Filed Under: Books: History
- Writer: Mick Fealty
- Mick Fealty's BC Writer page
- Mick Fealty's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Murphy
Indeed, I couldn't agree more! It is what makes the whole business such fun!
But there's a number of ways in which it already has been tidied and codified that could do with a bit more light shed upon; just to see what stands up and what falls apart, and what might take its place.
Mick





Ireland was well-aware of itself long before the 19th century.
That's what this St. Patrick's day celebration is all about.
I really like Ireland's tangled mass of history. Why tidy it up and codify it? That would just take the life out of it.