The no-war option isn't an option

Written by Walter Enderby
Published March 13, 2003

George Bush and Tony BlairYou know what scares me more than going to war with Iraq?

Not going to war with Iraq.

Especially now.

There can be nothing good that comes out of not going to war, not for the United States, not for our national security, not for our economy, not for the people of Iraq, not for Israel, not for the citizens of Europe, not the U.N. and especially not for the Bush Administration (not that I particularly give a shit about what happens to Bush's chances of re-election).

In a no-war-now scenario, nobody benefits.

MORE > >
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The no-war option isn't an option
Published: March 13, 2003
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: Walter Enderby
Walter Enderby's BC Writer page
Walter Enderby's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Walter Enderby
All Politics Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — March 13, 2003 @ 14:04PM — mike

If there's no war, the world will be a better and safer place. If there's no war, the message will go out that collective security arrangements, however flawed, can still preserve the peace. If there's no war, the "world plebiscite on Iraq" will have been won by the masses, who overwhelmingly, and without hesitation, oppose the war.

If there's no war, the U.S. public will hopefully (a boy can dream) focus its attention on the depraved partnership between far right evangelicals (many of whom are anti-Semitic, as Billy Graham boasted in that taped conversion with Nixon during the Vietnam War) and pro-Likud Jews (who by their actions are trashing the magnificent contributions that Jews, the most advanced and civilized culture in the history of the world, have made to America). "No war" will break the death grip of U.S. hegemony and allow other nations, like France and perhaps Brazil, to organize countervailing power blocs. "No war" will preserve the inspections regime in Iraq, which, by its diligent efforts, can hopefully set the stage for Saddam to agree to U.N. standards on human rights and then surrender power, truly freeing the Iraqi people to build a proud and prosperous nation.

I say "Shock and Awe" the War Party into submission and then worship the clear blue sky that emerges, bathing our children in its warm, bright glow.

#2 — March 13, 2003 @ 17:34PM — Steve Rhodes [URL]


The Americans & Iraqis who would have been killed will benefit from not going to war.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/3774)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments