White Apples by Jonathan Carroll

Written by Kevin Holtsberry
Published February 26, 2003
page 1 | 2

On another level the story is a cosmic battle between the forces of darkness and those of light. This level brings a sense of surrealism to the story. For example: Vincent is dead and Isabelle, who brought him back to life, is caring his baby. This baby is a sort of savior of mankind and as such has supernatural powers as does Ettrich the undead. Ettrich and Isabelle must not only unravel the problems of their own lives, they must untangle the mystery of Ettrich's death. Within this struggle, the meaning of life is explained. I won't go into all the details in case you want to read the book yourself but it gets rather metaphysical and hard to follow at times.

Both of these levels work in some way. The story is intersting and there are enough twists and turns to keep the plot moving. The writing is fresh and lively and keeps the reader interested. But the two never really intertwine in such a way as to elevate the book from interesting to insightful. The conversations and thoughts on relationships and life are strong and enjoyable but the overall metaphysical punch is laking. If you are going to try and create an alternate meaning behind the universe you need to have either a unique insight or a really cool concept. White Apples doesn't quite reach either. It comes off as kind of a neat new age love story without the philosophical meat. I think Publishers Weekly got it about right:

The story is a classic Carroll romp in which personified states of mind achieve independent life, characters interact with quirky incarnations of aspects of themselves, and bizarre metaphors ("When you're dead they teach you how to make a water sandwich") are illuminatingly literalized. But Vincent's puzzlement over his quest and the iconic roles others play in it demands talky explanations that interrupt the spontaneous flow of fantasy and suggest the author has overreached in his stabs at inventive symbolism. The novel boasts its share of the fresh perspectives on life and love that Carroll's fans have come to expect, but readers may finish it feeling a bit like Vincent, more instructed than entertained.

Overall, I would say if you enjoy thought provoking fiction in the "magic realism" vein, or you just like interesting stories about life and love, then White Apples would be worth your time. But if you are looking for real philosophical or existential insight you will likely be disappointed.

page 1 | 2
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Buy from Amazon.com
White Apples White Apples
Jonathan Carroll
Book,

White Apples by Jonathan Carroll
Published: February 26, 2003
Type:
Section: Books
Filed Under: Books: Fantasy
Writer: Kevin Holtsberry
Kevin Holtsberry's BC Writer page
Kevin Holtsberry's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Kevin Holtsberry
Books: Fantasy
All Books Articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 29, 2003 @ 11:11AM — dagmar lipovics

People either "get" Jonathan Carroll or they don't. Those who don't dismiss him as not having done this or that but that means they're missing the greater point-- he's one of the few writers around today who covers all bases at once-- genre, mainstream, literary-- and more often than not hits a double, triple, or home run. Those who don't get him, as is obvious with this reviewer, think he's just popped out.
Wrong.
The man's a genius. Period.

#2 — September 29, 2003 @ 11:32AM — Tom Johnson [URL]

I agree with comment #1. Carroll's Outside the Dog Museum is one of my favorite books, and it's because he manages to weave "magic realism" with humor, but rarely gets too heavy-handed with the "magic" part of it - it always works out in the end. Readers who want something really different need to check him out.

#3 — September 29, 2003 @ 12:26PM — Kevin Holtsberry [URL]

No offense but that is a rather lame retort: "you either get it or you don't." Since you fail to offer a reason, I can't really debate the issue. I enjoyed the book but that doesn't mean it was the best ever written. If every book Carroll writes isn't viewed as a "home run" does that mean I don't get it?

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/3453)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments