Our Pal Tony: Part 2

Written by Eric Olsen
Published February 16, 2003
page 1 | 2 | 3

No-one seriously believes he is yet co-operating fully. In all honesty, most people don't really believe he ever will. So what holds people back? What brings thousands of people out in protests across the world? And let's not pretend, not really that in March or April or May or June, people will feel different. It's not really an issue of timing or 200 inspectors versus 100. It is a right and entirely understandable hatred of war. It is moral purpose, and I respect that.

It is as one woman put it to me: I abhor the consequences of war.

....Yes, there are consequences of war. If we remove Saddam by force, people will die and some will be innocent. And we must live with the consequences of our actions, even the unintended ones.

But there are also consequences of "stop the war".

If I took that advice, and did not insist on disarmament, yes, there would be no war. But there would still be Saddam. Many of the people marching will say they hate Saddam. But the consequences of taking their advice is that he stays in charge of Iraq, ruling the Iraqi people. A country that in 1978, the year before he seized power, was richer than Malaysia or Portugal. A country where today, 135 out of every 1000 Iraqi children die before the age of five - 70% of these deaths are from diarrhoea and respiratory infections that are easily preventable. Where almost a third of children born in the centre and south of Iraq have chronic malnutrition.

Where 60% of the people depend on Food Aid.

Where half the population of rural areas have no safe water.

Where every year and now, as we speak, tens of thousands of political prisoners languish in appalling conditions in Saddam's jails and are routinely executed.

Where in the past 15 years over 150,000 Shia Moslems in Southern Iraq and Moslem Kurds in Northern Iraq have been butchered; with up to four million Iraqis in exile round the world, including 350,000 now in Britain.

This isn't a regime with Weapons of Mass Destruction that is otherwise benign. This is a regime that contravenes every single principle or value anyone of our politics believes in.

There will be no march for the victims of Saddam, no protests about the thousands of children that die needlessly every year under his rule, no righteous anger over the torture chambers which if he is left in power, will be left in being. Reasonable people ask if war is worth the cost - this is why it is. Thanks Tony, again.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Our Pal Tony: Part 2
Published: February 16, 2003
Type:
Section: Politics
Writer: Eric Olsen
Eric Olsen's BC Writer page
Eric Olsen's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Eric Olsen
All Politics Articles
Eric Olsen's personal weblog
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 16, 2003 @ 15:52PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

Eric, are you high on crack or driveway sealant? Tony Blair is an opportunistic little weasel who has corrupted the Labour Party, selling out social democracy at every turn.

Americans seem to love Blair because they have no idea of how parliamentary democracy works. It isn't about a leader and dicates, it is about consensus and managing the odds. Blair is riding his party into oblivion just as Brian Mulroney did with the Tories in Canada.

#2 — February 16, 2003 @ 16:12PM — Eric Olsen

Jim, you live in a mirror world: what is important to me, you utterly discount, what seems important to you is beside the point to me. "Social democracy"? horseshit in need of being sold out. Blair is a great and moral wartime leader, that's what is important.

#3 — February 16, 2003 @ 16:38PM — Jim Carruthers [URL]

Yep, driveway sealant, obviously crack is too upscale for you.

Blair has sold out every principle his party stands for. If he wanted to be Thatcher in drag, he should have run for the Tories. We need fewer "wartime leaders" and more people committed to solving problems instead of causing them. I care about employment, health care, housing and social equity. So this means you promote pestilance, disease, war and famine?

Hey, let me scare you with an egg salad sandwich and some Red Green videos.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/3224)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments